|
|
||||||||
Thoracic Imaging |
1 From the Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh, School of Medicine, 200 Lothrop St, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 (K.T.B., C.T., C.H., F.Z.); Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (T.A.G., C.F.H.); Department of Radiology, Abant
zzet Baysal University, School of Medicine, Golkoy-Bolu, Turkey (S.G.); and Siemens Medical Systems, Iselin, NJ (M.M.). Received December 27, 2005; revision requested February 22, 2006; revision received March 17; accepted May 2; final version accepted May 5.
Address correspondence to K.T.B. (e-mail: baek{at}upmc.edu).
Purpose: To retrospectively evaluate the amount of contrast medium required with 16- and 64-section computed tomography (CT) for a given patient weight to achieve desirable contrast enhancement during pulmonary CT angiography.
Materials and Methods: Institutional review board approval was obtained, and informed consent was not required for this HIPAA-compliant study. Eighty-five patients (35 men, 50 women; range, 2287 years) who had undergone 16-section (n = 48) or 64-section (n = 37) CT for the detection of pulmonary embolism were retrospectively evaluated. Contrast medium containing 350 mg of iodine per milliliter was injected at a rate of 4 mL/sec. The injected volume corresponded to the injection rate multiplied by the sum of the scanning delay plus the scanning duration, up to 125 mL. The scanning delay was determined with bolus tracking. Contrast enhancement was measured in the main pulmonary artery and the aorta. For each patient, the injected contrast medium volume per body weight index was calculated. Linear regression analysis was performed, and the Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to assess differences between 16- and 64-section CT.
Results: A range of patient weights (45.3153.0 kg) and contrast medium volumes (76125 mL) were noted. The regression formula indicated that 1.2 mL per kilogram body weight of contrast medium was required to achieve 250 HU. The median scanning duration was shorter for 64-section CT than for 16-section CT (5.7 seconds vs 9.5 seconds, P < .001). Consequently, 64-section CT required 17.6% less contrast medium than did 16-section CT (85.4 mL vs 103.6 mL, P < .001). Median contrast enhancement in the pulmonary artery was 8.9% lower with 64-section CT than with 16-section CT (257.7 HU vs 282.9 HU, P = .11).
Conclusion: To achieve consistent contrast enhancement during pulmonary CT angiography, the amount of contrast medium can be adjusted to the patient's body weight.
© RSNA, 2007
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. T. Bae, A. J. Shah, S. S. Shang, J. H. Wang, S. Chang, M. Kanematsu, and C. F. Hildebolt Aortic and Hepatic Contrast Enhancement with Abdominal 64-MDCT in Pediatric Patients: Effect of Body Weight and Iodine Dose Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2008; 191(5): 1589 - 1594. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Roggenland, S. A. Peters, S. P. Lemburg, T. Holland-Letz, V. Nicolas, and C. M. Heyer CT Angiography in Suspected Pulmonary Embolism: Impact of Patient Characteristics and Different Venous Lines on Vessel Enhancement and Image Quality Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2008; 190(6): W351 - W359. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. T. Bae, B. A. Seeck, C. F. Hildebolt, C. Tao, F. Zhu, M. Kanematsu, and P. K. Woodard Contrast Enhancement in Cardiovascular MDCT: Effect of Body Weight, Height, Body Surface Area, Body Mass Index, and Obesity Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2008; 190(3): 777 - 784. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| RADIOLOGY | RADIOGRAPHICS | RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE |