Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2422052132
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bae, K. T.
Right arrow Articles by Hildebolt, C. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bae, K. T.
Right arrow Articles by Hildebolt, C. F.
(Radiology 2007;242:582-589.)
© RSNA, 2007


Thoracic Imaging

Effect of Patient Weight and Scanning Duration on Contrast Enhancement during Pulmonary Multidetector CT Angiography1

Kyongtae T. Bae, MD, PhD, Cheng Tao, MD, Safiye Gürel, MD, Cheng Hong, MD, PhD, Fang Zhu, MD, PhD, Todd A. Gebke, RT, Margherita Milite, PhD and Charles F. Hildebolt, DDS, PhD

1 From the Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh, School of Medicine, 200 Lothrop St, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 (K.T.B., C.T., C.H., F.Z.); Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (T.A.G., C.F.H.); Department of Radiology, Abant Yzzet Baysal University, School of Medicine, Golkoy-Bolu, Turkey (S.G.); and Siemens Medical Systems, Iselin, NJ (M.M.). Received December 27, 2005; revision requested February 22, 2006; revision received March 17; accepted May 2; final version accepted May 5. Address correspondence to K.T.B. (e-mail: baek{at}upmc.edu).

Purpose: To retrospectively evaluate the amount of contrast medium required with 16- and 64-section computed tomography (CT) for a given patient weight to achieve desirable contrast enhancement during pulmonary CT angiography.

Materials and Methods: Institutional review board approval was obtained, and informed consent was not required for this HIPAA-compliant study. Eighty-five patients (35 men, 50 women; range, 22–87 years) who had undergone 16-section (n = 48) or 64-section (n = 37) CT for the detection of pulmonary embolism were retrospectively evaluated. Contrast medium containing 350 mg of iodine per milliliter was injected at a rate of 4 mL/sec. The injected volume corresponded to the injection rate multiplied by the sum of the scanning delay plus the scanning duration, up to 125 mL. The scanning delay was determined with bolus tracking. Contrast enhancement was measured in the main pulmonary artery and the aorta. For each patient, the injected contrast medium volume per body weight index was calculated. Linear regression analysis was performed, and the Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to assess differences between 16- and 64-section CT.

Results: A range of patient weights (45.3–153.0 kg) and contrast medium volumes (76–125 mL) were noted. The regression formula indicated that 1.2 mL per kilogram body weight of contrast medium was required to achieve 250 HU. The median scanning duration was shorter for 64-section CT than for 16-section CT (5.7 seconds vs 9.5 seconds, P < .001). Consequently, 64-section CT required 17.6% less contrast medium than did 16-section CT (85.4 mL vs 103.6 mL, P < .001). Median contrast enhancement in the pulmonary artery was 8.9% lower with 64-section CT than with 16-section CT (257.7 HU vs 282.9 HU, P = .11).

Conclusion: To achieve consistent contrast enhancement during pulmonary CT angiography, the amount of contrast medium can be adjusted to the patient's body weight.

© RSNA, 2007




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
K. T. Bae, A. J. Shah, S. S. Shang, J. H. Wang, S. Chang, M. Kanematsu, and C. F. Hildebolt
Aortic and Hepatic Contrast Enhancement with Abdominal 64-MDCT in Pediatric Patients: Effect of Body Weight and Iodine Dose
Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2008; 191(5): 1589 - 1594.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
D. Roggenland, S. A. Peters, S. P. Lemburg, T. Holland-Letz, V. Nicolas, and C. M. Heyer
CT Angiography in Suspected Pulmonary Embolism: Impact of Patient Characteristics and Different Venous Lines on Vessel Enhancement and Image Quality
Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2008; 190(6): W351 - W359.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
K. T. Bae, B. A. Seeck, C. F. Hildebolt, C. Tao, F. Zhu, M. Kanematsu, and P. K. Woodard
Contrast Enhancement in Cardiovascular MDCT: Effect of Body Weight, Height, Body Surface Area, Body Mass Index, and Obesity
Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2008; 190(3): 777 - 784.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2007 by the Radiological Society of North America.