HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Appendix Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by O'Connor, S. D. Articles by Summers, R. M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by O'Connor, S. D. Articles by Summers, R. M. Related Collections Related Article

Lytic Metastases in Thoracolumbar Spine: Computer-aided Detection at CT—Preliminary Study¹

¹ From the Diagnostic Radiology Department, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bldg 10, Room 1C351, 10 Center Dr, MSC 1182, Bethesda, MD 20892-1182. Received February 17, 2006; revision requested April 21; revision received June 14; final version accepted July 7. Supported in part by the Intramural Research Program of the NIH, Clinical Center. Made possible through the Clinical Research Training Program, a public-private partnership supported jointly by the NIH and a grant to the Foundation for the NIH from Pfizer Pharmaceuticals Group. Address correspondence to R.M.S. (e-mail: rms{at}nih.gov).

Purpose: To evaluate the sensitivity of a computer-aided detection (CAD) system for detection of lytic thoracolumbar spinal lesions at body CT, with results of manual lesion segmentation as the reference standard.

Materials and Methods: The study was HIPAA compliant and institutional review board approved; the institutional review board waived the need for informed consent. The CAD system segments the spine on CT images and searches for detections that match size, shape, location, and attenuation criteria. To reduce false-positive findings, 16 features for each detection were computed and fed to a classifier trained with manually segmented lesions. The data set consisted of CT studies of 50 patients (30 men, 20 women; range, 18–82 years; mean, 54.8 years) with 28 lesions. Studies were assigned to either a training (29 studies) or testing (21 studies) set. Sensitivities and false-positive rates (FPRs) for training and testing sets were calculated for these lesions, which were probable lytic metastases with areas 0.8 cm² or greater.

Results: Training set sensitivity was 0.83 (10 of 12; 95% confidence interval: 0.51, 0.97), with an FPR of 7.4 per patient. Test set sensitivity was 0.94 (15 of 16; 95% confidence interval: 0.68, 1.00), with an FPR of 4.5 per patient. There was no significant difference between the CAD sensitivities of the training and test sets (P = .56). Of three false-negative findings, two were due to incomplete segmentation of the vertebral pedicle, and the third was rejected by the classifier. False-positive detections were most often attributable to veins that connect the basivertebral vein with the anterior venous plexus (106 [34%] of 310) and to low-attenuating disks (83 [27%] of 310).

Conclusion: This CAD system successfully identified probable lytic metastases in the thoracolumbar spine and generalized well to an independent testing set.

Supplemental material: http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/full/242/3/811/DC1

© RSNA, 2007

Related Article

Erratum
Radiology 2007 244: 320. [Full Text] [PDF]