Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print February 28, 2007, 10.1148/radiol.2431051825
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Appendix E1
Right arrow Appendix E2
Right arrow Appendix E3
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2431051825v1
243/1/132    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
(Radiology 2007;243:132-139.)
© RSNA, 2007


Gastrointestinal Imaging

Extramural Depth of Tumor Invasion at Thin-Section MR in Patients with Rectal Cancer: Results of the MERCURY Study1

MERCURY Study Group

1 From the Department of Radiology, Royal Marsden Hospital, Downs Rd, Surrey SM2 5PT, England (Gina Brown, MD, FRCR). The complete list of the MERCURY Study Group members and the author contributions list are cited in Appendix E1 (http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/full/2431051825/DC1). From the 2004 RSNA Annual Meeting. Received November 9, 2005; revision requested December 21; revision received June 8, 2006; accepted June 22; final version accepted August 30. Supported by the Pelican Cancer Foundation, with educational grants from Siemens Medical UK and the Wessex Cancer Trust. Address correspondence to G.B. (e-mail: gina.brown{at}rmh.nhs.uk).

Purpose: To prospectively evaluate the accuracy of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in depicting the extramural depth of tumor invasion in patients who have rectal cancer, with histopathologic results as the reference standard.

Materials and Methods: The Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Rectal Cancer European Equivalence (MERCURY) Study received ethics approval from all participating centers, and all patients gave informed consent. Consecutive patients (n = 679) with adenocarcinoma of the rectum consented to participate. Imaging workshops for participating specialist gastrointestinal radiologists were held to ensure standardization of image acquisition techniques. Standardized MR image interpretation and data reporting were performed by using previously validated criteria. MR images were prospectively singly read by the specialist gastrointestinal radiologists. The maximal extramural depth (EMD) of tumor spread, defined at histopathologic analysis as the distance from the outer edge of the longitudinal muscularis propria to the outer edge of the tumor, was measured and recorded. The maximal EMD was the reference standard. The MR and histopathologic results were considered to be equivalent when the 95% confidence interval of the difference between them was within ±0.5 mm.

Results: Tumor EMD measurements obtained at both MR imaging and histopathologic analysis were available for 295 (95%) of 311 patients after primary surgery. Mean EMDs were 2.80 mm ± 4.60 (standard deviation) and 2.81 mm ± 4.28 at MR imaging and histopathologic analysis, respectively. The mean difference between the MR-derived and histopathologically derived EMDs was –0.05 mm ± 3.85 (95% confidence interval: –0.49 mm, 0.40 mm). Therefore, MR and histopathologic assessments of tumor spread were considered equivalent to within 0.5 mm.

Conclusion: Demonstration of accurate measurement of the depth of extramural tumor spread in the MERCURY Study enabled accurate preoperative prognostication.

Supplemental material: http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/full/2431051825/DC1
http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/full/2431051825/DC2
http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/full/2431051825/DC3

© RSNA, 2007




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
D F JOHNSTON, K M LAWRENCE, B F SIZER, T H A ARULAMPALAM, R W MOTSON, E DOVE, and N LACEY
Locally advanced rectal cancer: histopathological correlation and predictive accuracy of serial MRI after neoadjuvant chemotherapy
Br. J. Radiol., April 1, 2009; 82(976): 332 - 336.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
B. Barbaro, C. Fiorucci, C. Tebala, V. Valentini, M. A. Gambacorta, F. M. Vecchio, G. Rizzo, C. Coco, A. Crucitti, C. Ratto, et al.
Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: MR Imaging in Prediction of Response after Preoperative Chemotherapy and Radiation Therapy
Radiology, March 1, 2009; 250(3): 730 - 739.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
F. G. M. Taylor, R. I. Swift, L. Blomqvist, and G. Brown
A Systematic Approach to the Interpretation of Preoperative Staging MRI for Rectal Cancer
Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2008; 191(6): 1827 - 1835.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
N. J. Smith, O. Shihab, A. Arnaout, R. I. Swift, and G. Brown
MRI for Detection of Extramural Vascular Invasion in Rectal Cancer
Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2008; 191(5): 1517 - 1522.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. H. Park, G. Brown, and A. R. Norman
Degree of Error of Thin-Section MR in Measuring Extramural Depth of Tumor Invasion in Patients with Rectal Cancer
Radiology, February 1, 2008; 246(2): 647 - 648.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The OncologistHome page
R. Glynne-Jones and M. Harrison
Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: What Is the Evidence for Induction Chemoradiation?
Oncologist, November 1, 2007; 12(11): 1309 - 1318.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]