Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print February 28, 2007, 10.1148/radiol.2431052098
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2431052098v1
243/1/229    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vogt, F. M.
Right arrow Articles by Quick, H. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vogt, F. M.
Right arrow Articles by Quick, H. H.
(Radiology 2007;243:229-238.)
© RSNA, 2007


Technical Developments

Peripheral Vascular Disease: Comparison of Continuous MR Angiography and Conventional MR Angiography—Pilot Study1

Florian M. Vogt, MD, Michael O. Zenge, MSc, Mark E. Ladd, PhD, Christoph U. Herborn, MD, Katja Brauck, MD, Wolfgang Luboldt, MD, Jörg Barkhausen, MD and Harald H. Quick, PhD

1 From the Departments of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology (F.M.V., M.O.Z., M.E.L., K.B., J.B., H.H.Q.) and Angiology (W.L.), University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstrasse 55, D-45122 Essen, Germany; and Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany (C.U.H.). Received December 22, 2005; revision requested February 21, 2006; revision received March 16; accepted May 2; final version accepted August 4. Address correspondence to F.M.V. (e-mail: florian.vogt{at}uni-essen.de).

The aim of this study was to prospectively assess the accuracy of three-dimensional magnetic resonance (MR) angiography for evaluation of stenosis in the peripheral arterial system with a continuous moving table technique, with conventional MR angiography as reference. This study was approved by the local institutional review board; informed consent was obtained. Five healthy male volunteers (mean age, 27 years; range, 24–35 years) and four men and one woman (mean age, 63 years; range, 46–78 years) with peripheral arterial occlusive disease were examined. Images obtained with both techniques showed excellent concordance (Cohen {kappa} = 0.75). Images obtained with a conventional protocol had higher quality compared with those obtained with the continuous technique (mean, 1.07 ± 0.25 [standard deviation] vs 1.58 ± 0.6; P < .05); small vessels appeared sharper on them. For detection of significant stenosis and occlusion, accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of the continuous technique were 92.8%, 100%, and 89.2%, respectively.

© RSNA, 2007




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
H. Ersoy and F. J. Rybicki
MR Angiography of the Lower Extremities
Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2008; 190(6): 1675 - 1684.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2007 by the Radiological Society of North America.