Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2431060194
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Madani, A.
Right arrow Articles by Gevenois, P. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Madani, A.
Right arrow Articles by Gevenois, P. A.
(Radiology 2007;243:250-257.)
© RSNA, 2007


Thoracic Imaging

Pulmonary Emphysema: Radiation Dose and Section Thickness at Multidetector CT Quantification—Comparison with Macroscopic and Microscopic Morphometry1

Afarine Madani, MD, Viviane De Maertelaer, PhD, Jacqueline Zanen, PhD and Pierre Alain Gevenois, MD, PhD

1 From the Department of Radiology, Hôpital Erasme (A.M., P.A.G.), and Statistical Unit, Institut de Recherche Interdiscisplinaire en Biologie Humaine et Moléculaire (V.D.M.), Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium; and Department of Histology, Université de Mons-Hainaut, Mons, Belgium (J.Z.). Received February 19, 2006; revision requested April 19; revision received May 21; accepted June 6; final version accepted July 25. Supported by the Erasme Funds for Medical Research. Address correspondence to A.M., Department of Radiology, CHU de Charleroi, Boulevard Paul Janson 92, 6000 Charleroi, Belgium (e-mail: Afarine{at}ladner-madani.com).

Purpose: To prospectively investigate the effects of radiation dose and section thickness on quantitative multidetector computed tomographic (CT) indexes of pulmonary emphysema.

Materials and Methods: The institutional review board approved this protocol. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients. Seventy patients (49 men, 21 women; age range, 38–79 years) referred for surgical resection of a lung tumor underwent multidetector CT with 4 x 1-mm collimation, 120 kVp, and 20 and 120 effective mAs. At each radiation dose, 1.25-, 5.0-, and 10.0-mm-thick sections were reconstructed at 10-mm intervals. From scans of the lobe or whole lung to be resected, relative areas (RAs) of lung with attenuation coefficients lower than nine thresholds and eight percentiles of the distribution of attenuation coefficients were compared with the histopathologic extent of emphysema, which was measured microscopically—by using the corrected mean interwall distance (MIWD) and the corrected mean perimeter (MP)—and macroscopically. Correlations between the data obtained by using attenuation thresholds and percentiles and the parameters macroscopic extent of emphysema, MIWD, and MP were investigated by using Spearman coefficients.

Results: The 1st percentile (r range, –0.394 to –0.675; P < .001) and attenuation coefficients of –980, –970, and –960 HU (r range, 0.478–0.664; P < .001) yielded the strongest correlations with macroscopic extent, MIWD, and MP, regardless of radiation dose or section thickness. The effects of radiation dose and section thickness on RAs of lung with attenuation coefficients lower than –960 HU (P = .007 and P < .001, respectively) and lower than –970 HU (P = .001 and P < .001, respectively) were significant. The effect of section thickness on the 1st percentile was significant (P < .001), whereas the effect of dose was not (P = .910).

Conclusion: At CT quantification of pulmonary emphysema, the tube current–time product can be reduced to 20 mAs, but both tube current–time product and section thickness should be kept constant in follow-up examinations.

© RSNA, 2007




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
B. C. Stoel, D. G. Parr, E. M. Bakker, H. Putter, J. Stolk, H. A. Gietema, A. M. Schilham, B. van Ginneken, R. J. van Klaveren, J. W. J. Lammers, et al.
Can the Extent of Low-Attenuation Areas on CT Scans Really Demonstrate Changes in the Severity of Emphysema?
Radiology, April 1, 2008; 247(1): 293 - 294.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
H. O. Coxson
Computed tomography and monitoring of emphysema
Eur. Respir. J., June 1, 2007; 29(6): 1075 - 1077.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2007 by the Radiological Society of North America.