Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print February 9, 2007, 10.1148/radiol.2431060696
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Erratum (v248,p1085)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2431060696v1
243/1/96    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fahey, F. H.
Right arrow Articles by Treves, S. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fahey, F. H.
Right arrow Articles by Treves, S. T.
(Radiology 2007;243:96-104.)
© RSNA, 2007


Experimental Studies

Dosimetry and Adequacy of CT-based Attenuation Correction for Pediatric PET: Phantom Study1

Frederic H. Fahey, DSc, Matthew R. Palmer, PhD, Keith J. Strauss, MS, Robert E. Zimmerman, MSEE, Ramsey D. Badawi, PhD and S. Ted Treves, MD

1 From the Division of Nuclear Medicine and Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital Boston, 300 Longwood Ave, Boston, MA 02115 (F.H.F., K.J.S., S.T.T.); Division of Nuclear Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Mass (M.R.P.); Division of Nuclear Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Mass (R.E.Z.); and Department of Radiology, University of California at Davis, Davis, Calif (R.D.B.). Received April 21, 2006; revision requested June 23; revision received July 12; accepted July 21; final version accepted September 1. Address correspondence to F.H.F. (e-mail: frederic.fahey{at}childrens.harvard.edu).

Purpose: To evaluate the dose from the computed tomographic (CT) portion of positron emission tomography (PET)/CT to determine minimum CT acquisition parameters that provide adequate attenuation correction.

Materials and Methods: Measurements were made with a PET/CT scanner or a PET scanner, five anthropomorphic phantoms (newborn to medium adult), and an ionization chamber. The CT dose was evaluated for acquisition parameters (10, 20, 40, 80, 160 mA; 80, 100, 120, 140 kVp; 0.5 and 0.8 second per rotation; 1.5:1 pitch). Thermoluminescent dosimetry was used to evaluate the germanium 68/gallium 68 rod sources. A phantom study was performed to evaluate CT image noise and the adequacy of PET attenuation correction as a function of CT acquisition parameters and patient size.

Results: The volumetric anthropomorphic CT dose index varied by two orders of magnitude for each phantom over the range of acquisition parameters (0.30 and 21.0 mGy for a 10-year-old with 80 kVp, 10 mAs, and 0.8 second and with 140 kVp, 160 mAs, and 0.8 second, respectively). The volumetric anthropomorphic CT dose index for newborn phantoms was twice that for adult phantoms acquired similarly. The rod source dose was 0.03 mGy (3-minute scan). Although CT noise varied substantially among acquisition parameters, its contribution to PET noise was minimal and yielded only a 2% variation in PET noise. In a pediatric phantom, PET images generated by using CT performed with 80 kVp and 5 mAs for attenuation correction were visually indistinguishable from those generated by using CT performed with 140 kVp and 128 mAs. With very-low-dose CT (80 kVp, 5 mAs) for the adult phantom, undercorrection of the PET data resulted.

Conclusion: For pediatric patients, adequate attenuation correction can be obtained with very-low-dose CT (80 kVp, 5 mAs, 1.5:1 pitch), and such correction leads to a 100-fold dose reduction relative to diagnostic CT. For adults undergoing CT with 5 mAs and 1.5:1 pitch, the tube voltage needs to be increased to 120 kVp to prevent undercorrection.

© RSNA, 2007







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2007 by the Radiological Society of North America.