Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2432060009
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Malone, D. E.
Right arrow Articles by Staunton, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Malone, D. E.
Right arrow Articles by Staunton, M.
(Radiology 2007;243:319-328.)
© RSNA, 2007


Evidence-based Radiology Series

Evidence-based Practice in Radiology: Step 5 (Evaluate)—Caveats and Common Questions1

Dermot E. Malone, MD, FRCPI, FFRRSCI, FRCR, FRCPC and Marie Staunton, MB, FRCSI, FFRRSCI

1 From the Department of Radiology, St Vincent's University Hospital, Elm Park, Dublin 4, Ireland (D.E.M.); and Department of Medical Imaging, Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (M.S.). Received January 3, 2006; revision requested March 2; revision received April 13; final version accepted June 12. Address correspondence to D.E.M. (e-mail: dmalone{at}ucd.ie).

So far, this series has described and illustrated the first four steps of the five-step evidence-based practice (EBP) process that was originally designed and taught by the medical epidemiologists of McMaster University (Hamilton, Ontario, Canada) and the National Health Service Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine (University of Oxford, Oxford, England). This article in the series first briefly considers the fifth step (evaluate). A more detailed consideration of caveats, common questions, and challenges relevant to EBP in radiology then follows. These are issues that merit some thought by those beginning or continuing work in EBP.

© RSNA, 2007




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
E. J. Heffernan, J. D. Dodd, and D. E. Malone
Cardiac Multidetector CT: Technical and Diagnostic Evaluation with Evidence-based Practice Techniques
Radiology, August 1, 2008; 248(2): 366 - 377.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
L. S. Medina and C. C. Blackmore
Evidence-based Radiology: Review and Dissemination
Radiology, August 1, 2007; 244(2): 331 - 336.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
W. Hollingworth and J. G. Jarvik
Technology Assessment in Radiology: Putting the Evidence in Evidence-based Radiology
Radiology, July 1, 2007; 244(1): 31 - 38.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
E. J. R. van Beek and D. E. Malone
Evidence-based Practice in Radiology Education: Why and How Should We Teach It?
Radiology, June 1, 2007; 243(3): 633 - 640.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2007 by the Radiological Society of North America.