| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
Gastrointestinal Imaging |
1 From the Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3808, Erwin Rd, Durham, NC 27710. Received March 25, 2006; revision requested May 24; revision received June 25; accepted July 21; final version accepted September 27. Supported by a grant from E-Z-Em, Westbury, NY. Address correspondence to R.C.N. (e-mail: rendon.nelson{at}duke.edu).
Purpose: To prospectively determine quantitatively and qualitatively the timing of maximal enhancement of the normal small-bowel wall by using contrast material–enhanced multi–detector row computed tomography (CT).
Materials and Methods: This HIPAA-compliant study was approved by the institutional review board. After information on radiation risk was given, written informed consent was obtained from 25 participants with no history of small-bowel disease (mean age, 58 years; 19 men) who had undergone single-level dynamic CT. Thirty seconds after the intravenous administration of contrast material, a serial dynamic acquisition, consisting of 10 images obtained 5 seconds apart, was performed. Enhancement measurements were obtained over time from the small-bowel wall and the aorta. Three independent readers qualitatively assessed small-bowel conspicuity. Quantitative and qualitative data were analyzed during the arterial phase, the enteric phase (which represented peak small-bowel mural enhancement), and the venous phase. Statistical analysis included paired Student t test and Wilcoxon signed rank test with Bonferroni correction. A P value less than .05 was used to indicate a significant difference.
Results: The mean time to peak enhancement of the small-bowel wall was 49.3 seconds ± 7.7 (standard deviation) and 13.5 seconds ± 7.6 after peak aortic enhancement. Enhancement values were highest during the enteric phase (P < .05). Regarding small-bowel conspicuity, images obtained during the enteric phase were most preferred qualitatively; there was a significant difference between the enteric and arterial phases (P < .001) but not between the enteric and venous phases (P = .18).
Conclusion: At multi–detector row CT, peak mural enhancement of the normal small bowel occurs on average about 50 seconds after intravenous administration of contrast material or 14 seconds after peak aortic enhancement.
© RSNA, 2007
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  H. A. Siddiki, J. L. Fidler, J. G. Fletcher, S. S. Burton, J. E. Huprich, D. M. Hough, C. D. Johnson, D. H. Bruining, E. V. Loftus Jr., W. J. Sandborn, et al. Prospective Comparison of State-of-the-Art MR Enterography and CT Enterography in Small-Bowel Crohn's Disease Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2009; 193(1): 113 - 121. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Furukawa, S. Kanasaki, N. Kono, M. Wakamiya, T. Tanaka, M. Takahashi, and K. Murata CT Diagnosis of Acute Mesenteric Ischemia from Various Causes Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2009; 192(2): 408 - 416. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. E. Baker, J. Walter, N. A. Obuchowski, J.-P. Achkar, D. Einstein, J. C. Veniero, J. Vogel, and L. Stocchi Mural Attenuation in Normal Small Bowel and Active Inflammatory Crohn's Disease on CT Enterography: Location, Absolute Attenuation, Relative Attenuation, and the Effect of Wall Thickness Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2009; 192(2): 417 - 423. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. Soyer, M. Boudiaf, Y. Fargeaudou, X. Dray, L. Hamzi, K. Vahedi, A. Lavergne-Slove, and R. Rymer Celiac Disease in Adults: Evaluation with MDCT Enteroclysis Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2008; 191(5): 1483 - 1492. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. K. Hara, S. Alam, R. I. Heigh, S. R. Gurudu, J. G. Hentz, and J. A. Leighton Using CT Enterography to Monitor Crohn's Disease Activity: A Preliminary Study Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2008; 190(6): 1512 - 1516. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
