Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print March 13, 2007, 10.1148/radiol.2432050930
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2432050930v1
243/2/461    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vaño, E.
Right arrow Articles by de Las Heras, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vaño, E.
Right arrow Articles by de Las Heras, H.
(Radiology 2007;243:461-466.)
© RSNA, 2007


Medical Physics

Transition from Screen-Film to Digital Radiography: Evolution of Patient Radiation Doses at Projection Radiography1

Eliseo Vaño, PhD, José Miguel Fernández, MSc, José Ignacio Ten, MSc, Carlos Prieto, MSc, Luciano González, PhD, Ricardo Rodríguez, MD, PhD, and Hugo de Las Heras, MSc

1 From the Medical Physics Service (E.V., J.M.F., C.P., H.d.L.H.) and Radiology Service (J.I.T., R.R.), San Carlos University Hospital, 28040 Madrid, Spain; and the Radiology Department, Complutense University, Madrid, Spain (E.V., J.M.F., L.G., R.R.). Received June 3, 2005; revision requested July 29; revision received June 9, 2006; accepted July 19; final version accepted September 8. Supported in part by the European Commission (DIMOND and SENTINEL programs), the Spanish Ministry for Science and Technology (project BFI2003-09434), the Spanish Ministry of Health (Directorate General of Public Health), and the Autonomous Community of Madrid (project GR/SAL/0272/2004). Address correspondence to L.G. (e-mail: luciano{at}med.ucm.es).

Purpose: To retrospectively evaluate patient radiation doses in projection radiography after the transition to computed radiography (CR) in the authors' hospital.

Materials and Methods: The hospital's ethical committee approved the study and waived informed consent. In 2001, a dose reduction initiative was implemented, which involved collecting radiographic parameters, calculating patient entrance doses, and monitoring changes with an online computer, and a training program for radiographers was conducted. A database with 204 660 patient dose values was used to compute changes in patient doses over time. Sample sizes ranged from 1800 to 23 000 examinations. Doses were compared with European and American reference values. Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests were used for statistical analysis.

Results: Median values for patient entrance doses increased 40%–103% after implementation of CR. Initial increases were corrected during the 1st year, and additional dose decreases were achieved after the dose reduction initiative was launched. At present, doses range between 15% and 38% of the European diagnostic reference levels established for screen-film radiography and between 28% and 41% of the reference values recommended by the American Association of Physicists in Medicine, representing an effective 20%–50% reduction in the initial values for CR.

Conclusion: Though patient doses can increase considerably during the transition from conventional screen-film radiography to CR, dose management programs, including specific training of radiographers and patient dose audits, allow for reductions of the previous values.

© RSNA, 2007




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
F. A. Mettler Jr, W. Huda, T. T. Yoshizumi, and M. Mahesh
Effective Doses in Radiology and Diagnostic Nuclear Medicine: A Catalog
Radiology, July 1, 2008; 248(1): 254 - 263.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Radiat Prot DosimetryHome page
J. M. Fernandez, J. M. Ordiales, E. Guibelalde, C. Prieto, and E. Vano
Physical image quality comparison of four types of digital detector for chest radiology
Radiat Prot Dosimetry, March 1, 2008; 129(1-3): 140 - 143.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Radiat Prot DosimetryHome page
K. Smans, E. Vano, R. Sanchez, F. W. Schultz, J. Zoetelief, T. Kiljunen, C. Maccia, H. Jarvinen, R. Bly, A. Kosunen, et al.
Results of a European survey on patient doses in paediatric radiology
Radiat Prot Dosimetry, March 1, 2008; 129(1-3): 204 - 210.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2007 by the Radiological Society of North America.