|
|
||||||||
Cardiac Imaging |
1 From the Department of Medicine, Cardiovascular Division (D.C.P., J.V.W., T.H.H., K.V.K., R.M.B., V.E., M.E.J., W.J.M.) and Department of Radiology (W.J.M.), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, 330 Brookline Ave, RW 453, Boston, MA 02215. Received March 6, 2006; revision requested May 4; revision received June 21; accepted July 20; final version accepted September 27. Supported by grants from the American Heart Association (AHA SDG 0530061N) and the National Institutes of Health (NIBIB K01 EB004434-01A1). V.E. received a Clinician Scientist Award from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research. Address correspondence to D.C.P. (e-mail: dcpeters{at}bidmc.harvard.edu).
Purpose: To prospectively evaluate whether scar caused by radiofrequency (RF) ablation of the left atrium (LA) in patients with atrial fibrillation can be depicted with high-spatial-resolution delayed enhancement magnetic resonance (MR) imaging.
Materials and Methods: All 23 subjects (16 men, seven women; mean age, 54 years ± 13 [standard deviation]) provided written informed consent; the study was approved by the local institutional review board and was HIPAA compliant. A high-spatial-resolution free-breathing delayed enhancement MR imaging method was developed to detect scar (ie, ablated tissue) in the LA and pulmonary veins (PVs). The LA in 15 patients before ablation and in 18 patients at least 30 days after ablation was examined. A reader with 4 years of experience assessed presence of delayed enhancement on images and circumferential completeness. Signal-to-noise and contrast-to-noise ratios were measured and compared with an unpaired t test. The relationship between measurements of enhancement thickness at the interatrial septum and the number of days after ablation was investigated.
Results: No subject demonstrated preablation delayed enhancement of the atrial or PV wall, whereas postablation delayed enhancement was identified in all (100%). In patients after ablation, a partial to completely circumferential delayed enhancement pattern could be identified for the left inferior PV that encompassed 88% ± 11 of the circumference, but only 62% of patients demonstrated more than 90% circumferential delayed enhancement. The signal-to-noise ratio of blood was 12, and the signal-to-noise ratios of the pre- and postablation left atrial wall were 15 and 22, respectively (P < .05). A relationship between delayed enhancement wall thickness and the inverse of the time interval from ablation was identified (P < .05).
Conclusion: High-spatial-resolution delayed enhancement MR imaging allows noninvasive identification of scar induced by RF ablation following isolation therapy of the PV.
© RSNA, 2007
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. F. Tops and J. J. Bax The Year in Imaging Related to Electrophysiology J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Img., April 1, 2009; 2(4): 498 - 510. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. C. Peters, J. V. Wylie, T. H. Hauser, R. Nezafat, Y. Han, J. J. Woo, J. Taclas, K. V. Kissinger, B. Goddu, M. E. Josephson, et al. Recurrence of atrial fibrillation correlates with the extent of post-procedural late gadolinium enhancement a pilot study. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Img., March 1, 2009; 2(3): 308 - 316. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. J. Francois, D. Tuite, V. Deshpande, R. Jerecic, P. Weale, and J. C. Carr Pulmonary Vein Imaging with Unenhanced Three-dimensional Balanced Steady-State Free Precession MR Angiography: Initial Clinical Evaluation Radiology, March 1, 2009; 250(3): 932 - 939. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Nazarian, D. A. Bluemke, and H. R. Halperin Applications of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance in Electrophysiology Circ Arrhythmia Electrophysiol, February 1, 2009; 2(1): 63 - 71. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Knecht, I. Nault, M. Wright, S. Matsuo, N. Lellouche, P. E. Somasundaram, M. D. O'Neill, K.-T. Lim, F. Sacher, A. Deplagne, et al. Imaging in catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: enhancing the clinician's view Europace, November 1, 2008; 10(suppl_3): iii2 - iii7. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. H. Hauser, D. C. Peters, J. V. Wylie, and W. J. Manning Evaluating the left atrium by magnetic resonance imaging Europace, November 1, 2008; 10(suppl_3): iii22 - iii27. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. J. McGann, E. G. Kholmovski, R. S. Oakes, J. J.E. Blauer, M. Daccarett, N. Segerson, K. J. Airey, N. Akoum, E. Fish, T. J. Badger, et al. New Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Method for Defining the Extent of Left Atrial Wall Injury After the Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 7, 2008; 52(15): 1263 - 1271. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. R. Halperin and S. Nazarian Damage Assessment After Ablation: Role of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 7, 2008; 52(15): 1272 - 1273. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Han, D. C. Peters, C. J. Salton, D. Bzymek, R. Nezafat, B. Goddu, K. V. Kissinger, P. J. Zimetbaum, W. J. Manning, and S. B. Yeon Cardiovascular magnetic resonance characterization of mitral valve prolapse. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Img., May 1, 2008; 1(3): 294 - 303. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Rademaker, F. Saremi, and S. Krishnan Invited Commentary * Authors' Response RadioGraphics, November 1, 2007; 27(6): 1566 - 1567. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||