HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 2433060421v1 243/3/744    most recent Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Wieder, H. A. Articles by Stollfuss, J. C. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Wieder, H. A. Articles by Stollfuss, J. C.

Rectal Cancer: MR Imaging before Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Radiation Therapy for Prediction of Tumor-Free Circumferential Resection Margins and Long-term Survival¹

¹ From the Departments of Radiology (H.A.W., A.B., K.W., M.D., E.J.R., J.C.S.), Surgery (R.R., F.L., J.R.S.), Hematology/Medical Oncology (F.L.), Radiation Oncology (H.G.), and Pathology (K.B.), Technische Universität München, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Ismaningerstrasse 22, 81675 Munich, Germany. Received March 7, 2006; revision requested May 4; revision received July 9; accepted August 2; final version accepted October 12. Address correspondence to H.A.W. (e-mail: h{at}wieder.de ).

Purpose: To retrospectively evaluate the prognostic importance of involvement of the circumferential resection margin predicted by using magnetic resonance (MR) imaging before neoadjuvant treatment in patients with rectal cancer.

Materials and Methods: The local institutional review board approved the retrospective analysis of the data and waived informed consent. Sixty-eight patients (52 men, 16 women; mean age ± standard deviation, 58.9 years ± 9.4) with cT3 NX M0 tumors were included. T2-weighted MR images were analyzed in consensus by two radiologists with respect to the shortest distance between the outermost parts of the tumor to the adjacent mesorectal fascia (as the potential circumferential resection margin in total mesorectal excision). Histopathologic and follow-up data were available for all patients (mean follow-up time, 54 months; range, 31–77 months). To compare local recurrence and survival rates, the population was divided into three groups categorized according to the minimum distance of the tumor to the mesorectal fascia (group 1, 1 mm; group 2, >1 to 5 mm; group 3, >5 mm). Univariate Cox and multivariate proportional hazard regression models were used to test the prognostic importance of clinical, histopathologic regression, and histopathologic tumor parameters.

Results: MR imaging led to accurate prediction of a histologically involved circumferential resection margin (sensitivity, 100%; specificity, 88%). The rates for local recurrence (group 1, 33%; group 2, 5%; group 3, 6%; P < .02) and 5-year overall survival (group 1, 39%; group 2, 70%; group 3, 90%; P < .001) differed significantly among the predefined groups. The distance to the mesorectal fascia was an independent prognostic parameter in multivariate analysis (P < .001), and histopathologic response to treatment provided no additional information.

Conclusion: Prediction of the tumor-free circumferential resection margin assessed with MR imaging before initiation of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiation therapy proved to be a prognostic factor in rectal cancer.

© RSNA, 2007