Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print April 26, 2007, 10.1148/radiol.2433060993
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2433060993v1
243/3/766    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McCollough, C. H.
Right arrow Articles by Buysman, J. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by McCollough, C. H.
Right arrow Articles by Buysman, J. R.
(Radiology 2007;243:766-774.)
© RSNA, 2007


Innovations

Effects of CT Irradiation on Implantable Cardiac Rhythm Management Devices1

Cynthia H. McCollough, PhD, Jie Zhang, PhD, Andrew N. Primak, PhD, Wesley J. Clement, BSEE, and John R. Buysman, PhD

1 From the Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905 (C.H.M., J.Z., A.N.P.); and Cardiac Rhythm Disease Management, Medtronic, Minneapolis, Minn (W.J.C., J.R.B.). Received June 8, 2006; revision requested August 10; revision received November 21; final version accepted December 6. Address correspondence to C.H.M. (e-mail: mccollough.cynthia{at}mayo.edu).

Purpose: To prospectively measure the response of a variety of models of implantable cardiac rhythm management devices (ICRMDs) to the radiation delivered by computed tomography (CT), for both maximum and typical dose levels.

Materials and Methods: Twenty-one ICRMDs (13 pacemakers, eight cardioverter-defibrillators) manufactured by Medtronic (Minneapolis, Minn) were exposed to ionizing radiation from CT systems in both spiral and dynamic acquisition modes at maximum and typical dose levels. Devices were monitored during exposure to check for any operational abnormalities and were interrogated after exposure to check for any residual abnormalities. Total radiation dose and peak dose rate were measured, and the volume CT dose index was recorded.

Results: Oversensing was observed in 20 of 21 devices at maximum doses and in 17 of 20 devices at typical doses. Oversensing most often manifested as inhibition, although it occasionally manifested as tracking or safety pacing. Two devices inhibited for more than 4 seconds in spiral mode at clinical dose levels. Oversensing was transient and ceased as soon as the device stopped moving through the x-ray beam or the beam was turned off. The partial electrical reset (PER) safety feature was activated in two models, InSync 8040 and Thera DR. With the exception of PER, programming was not altered. Effects occurred only if the x-ray beam passed directly over the ICRMD.

Conclusion: CT irradiation at typical clinical doses results in oversensing of ICRMDs in the majority of devices tested, although the identified effects were predominantly transient.

© RSNA, 2007