HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text All Versions of this Article: 2431052133v1 243/1/276    most recent Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Atwell, T. D. Articles by Blute, M. L. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Atwell, T. D. Articles by Blute, M. L.

Percutaneous Cryoablation of 40 Solid Renal Tumors with US Guidance and CT Monitoring: Initial Experience¹

¹ From the Departments of Radiology (T.D.A., M.A.F., M.R.C., J.W.C.) and Urology (B.C.L., D.E.P., G.K.C., M.L.B.), Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905. Received December 28, 2005; revision requested February 22, 2006; revision received April 5; accepted May 10; final version accepted July 21. Address correspondence to T.D.A. (e-mail: atwell.thomas{at}mayo.edu).

Purpose: To retrospectively determine the safety and effectiveness of percutaneous cryoablation, monitored with computed tomography (CT), for the treatment of solid renal masses.

Materials and Methods: This study was compliant with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act and had institutional review board approval; informed consent was waived. From March 12, 2003, through August 4, 2005, 23 men and 17 women (mean age, 76 years ± 9.7 [standard deviation]; range, 53–92 years), each with a single renal tumor, underwent one percutaneous cryoablation treatment session that combined ultrasonographic (US) guidance and CT monitoring. Technical success was defined as extension of the visible ice ball 5 mm beyond the tumor margin. Local tumor progression was defined as any tumor with intralesional enhancement or a serial increase in tumor size when compared with that on images obtained immediately after ablation. Tumor characteristics, complications, and follow-up were evaluated.

Results: The maximum diameter of the 40 treated lesions ranged from 1.5 to 7.2 cm (mean, 3.4 cm ± 1.3). Twenty (50%) of 40 tumors were 3 cm or larger in diameter. Nineteen tumors (48%) extended into the renal sinus fat. One complication (2%) conformed to a grade 3 event, as determined with the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 3.0) of the National Cancer Institute; the overall complication rate was 8%. Thirty-eight (95%) of 40 cryoablation procedures were technically successful. Twenty-nine patients underwent follow-up (mean, 8.0 months ± 4.3; range, 1.2–18.4 months); no local tumor recurrence was found.

Conclusion: Percutaneous cryoablation with US guidance and CT monitoring is safe and effective for the treatment of solid renal tumors. Longer follow-up should provide further proof of the effectiveness of this technique.

© RSNA, 2007

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. L. Hinshaw, A. M. Shadid, S. Y. Nakada, S. P. Hedican, T. C. Winter III, and F. T. Lee Jr. Comparison of Percutaneous and Laparoscopic Cryoablation for the Treatment of Solid Renal Masses Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2008; 191(4): 1159 - 1168. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]