HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 2441060749v1 244/1/213    most recent Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by U-King-Im, J. M. Articles by Gillard, J. H. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by U-King-Im, J. M. Articles by Gillard, J. H.

Internal Carotid Artery Stenosis: Accuracy of Subjective Visual Impression for Evaluation with Digital Subtraction Angiography and Contrast-enhanced MR Angiography¹

¹ From the University Department of Radiology (J.M.U., M.J.G., J.J.C., N.J.H., J.W., T.T., S.P.S.H., N.M.A., J.H.G.) and Department of Neurosurgery (R.A.T., P.J.K.), Addenbrooke's Hospital, Box 219, Cambridge CB2 2QQ, England. Received April 29, 2006; revision requested June 27; revision received July 17; accepted August 23; final version accepted November 1. Supported by a grant from the National Health Service Research and Development Programme. Address correspondence to J.H.G. (e-mail: jhg21{at}cam.ac.uk).

Purpose: To prospectively determine, for both digital subtraction angiography (DSA) and contrast material–enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) angiography, the accuracy of subjective visual impression (SVI) in the evaluation of internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis, with objective caliper measurements serving as the reference standard.

Materials and Methods: Local ethics committee approval and written informed patient consent were obtained. A total of 142 symptomatic patients (41 women, 101 men; mean age, 70 years; age range, 44–89 years) suspected of having ICA stenosis on the basis of Doppler ultrasonographic findings underwent both DSA and contrast-enhanced MR angiography. With each modality, three independent neuroradiologists who were blinded to other test results first visually estimated and subsequently objectively measured stenoses. Diagnostic accuracy and percentage misclassification for correct categorization of 70%–99% stenosis were calculated for SVI, with objective measurements serving as the reference standard. Interobserver variability was determined with statistics.

Results: After exclusion of arteries that were unsuitable for measurement, 180 vessels remained for analysis with DSA and 159 vessels remained for analysis with contrast-enhanced MR angiography. With respect to 70%–99% stenosis, SVI was associated with average misclassification of 8.9% for DSA (8.9%, 7.8%, and 10.0% for readers A, B, and C, respectively) and of 11.7% for contrast-enhanced MR angiography (11.3%, 8.8%, and 15.1% for readers A, B, and C, respectively). Negative predictive values were excellent (92.3%–100%). Interobserver variability was higher for SVI (DSA, = 0.62–0.71; contrast-enhanced MR angiography, = 0.57–0.69) than for objective measurements (DSA, = 0.75–0.80; contrast-enhanced MR angiography, = 0.66–0.72).

Conclusion: SVI alone is not recommended for evaluation of ICA stenosis with both DSA and contrast-enhanced MR angiography. SVI may be acceptable as an initial screening tool to exclude the presence of 70%–99% stenosis, but caliper measurements are warranted to confirm the presence of such stenosis.

© RSNA, 2007

This article has been cited by other articles:

				F. Runck, R.P. Steiner, W.A. Bautz, and M.M. Lell MR Imaging: Influence of Imaging Technique and Postprocessing on Measurement of Internal Carotid Artery Stenosis AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., October 1, 2008; 29(9): 1736 - 1742. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]