Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Published online before print May 23, 2007, 10.1148/radiol.2441061049
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Table E1
Right arrow Table E2
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2441061049v1
244/1/223    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zafar, H. M.
Right arrow Articles by Sunshine, J. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zafar, H. M.
Right arrow Articles by Sunshine, J. H.
(Radiology 2007;244:223-231.)
© RSNA, 2007

Health Policy and Practice

Satisfaction of Radiologists in the United States: A Comparison between 2003 and 19951

Hanna M. Zafar, MD, MHS, Rebecca S. Lewis, MPH, and Jonathan H. Sunshine, PhD

1 From the Department of Radiology, Hospital of University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa (H.M.Z.); Research Department, American College of Radiology, 1891 Preston White Dr, Reston, VA 20191 (R.S.L., J.H.S.); and Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Yale University, New Haven, Conn (J.H.S.). Received June 16, 2006; revision requested August 21; revision received September 28; final version accepted November 9. Address correspondence to R.S.L. (e-mail: rlewis@acr.org).

Purpose: To prospectively ascertain what characteristics of radiologists, their practices, and their work environment affect professional satisfaction and to describe recent changes in satisfaction.

Materials and Methods: Survey respondents were guaranteed confidentiality. Those who consented to participate were informed of the nature of the study. The authors analyzed nonindividually identified data from the American College of Radiology 2003 Survey of Radiologists, a nationally representative, confidential, stratified random-sample mail survey of radiologists in the United States, which had a 63% response rate, with a total of 1924 responses. Data were weighted to be representative of all U.S. radiologists and were analyzed by using univariate and multivariate analyses. The five answer options to questions regarding level of satisfaction corresponded to scores of +2, +1, 0, –1, and –2. Results were compared with those of a similar 1995 survey.

Results: Although 93% of radiologists enjoyed radiology very much or somewhat, the mean satisfaction score for posttraining professionally active radiologists decreased from 1.62 in 1995 to 1.47 in 2003. Thirty-two percent of radiologists reported enjoying radiology more than 5 years ago; 41% said they enjoyed it less. Excessive workload reduced current satisfaction and satisfaction relative to 5 years ago. Working in the Midwest enhanced current satisfaction and satisfaction relative to 5 years ago. Practice type and practice ownership had more varied effects on professional satisfaction; subspecialty type had relatively little effect. In 2003, medicolegal climate, workload, and reimbursement and/or financial pressures were the three most common reasons for decreased satisfaction. In 1995, interference from managed care; government regulations, control, and red tape; and increased administrative burden were the three most common reasons. Lifestyle and/or work hours, and income were the most common causes of increased satisfaction in 2003, but these were also often mentioned as causes of decreased satisfaction.

Conclusion: Radiologists have higher levels of professional satisfaction than do other physicians; however, as with physicians overall, their satisfaction has decreased over time.

Supplemental material: http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/full/2441061049/DC1
http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/full/2441061049/DC2

© RSNA, 2007




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
B. M. Geller, E. J. A. Bowles, H. Y. Sohng, R. J. Brenner, D. L. Miglioretti, P. A. Carney, and J. G. Elmore
Radiologists' Performance and Their Enjoyment of Interpreting Screening Mammograms
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2009; 192(2): 361 - 369.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]