HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 2441051790v1 244/1/31    most recent Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Hollingworth, W. Articles by Jarvik, J. G. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Hollingworth, W. Articles by Jarvik, J. G.

Technology Assessment in Radiology: Putting the Evidence in Evidence-based Radiology¹

¹ From the Departments of Radiology (W.H.), Pharmacy (W.H., J.G.J.), and Neurological Surgery (J.G.J.), University of Washington, Box 359960, 325 Ninth Ave, Seattle, WA 98104-2499. Received November 3, 2005; revision requested December 21; revision received January 12, 2006; final version accepted February 6. Address correspondence to W.H. (e-mail: willh{at}u.washington.edu).

In this review, which is part of a larger series on evidence-based practice in radiology, the relationship between technology assessment (TA) and the practice of evidence-based radiology (EBR) is discussed. TA guides researchers in the methods required to be reliable providers of unbiased and relevant evidence. Meanwhile, EBR equips radiologists with the skills needed to be discerning consumers of that evidence. Both paradigms aim to improve the effectiveness of health care spending. In this review, it is argued that EBR can be only as good as the TA on which it is based. However, TA is particularly complex in regard to diagnostic radiology because of the many links in the chain between the interim objective (to make the correct diagnosis) and the ultimate goal (to improve patient health). In this article, the development of TA in medicine in general and, more specifically, the TA hierarchy for the evaluation of diagnostic imaging are described. Some of the improvements in the pool of evidence during the past 30 years are documented, and some of the remaining tensions between TA and EBR are highlighted.

© RSNA, 2007

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. D. Mitchell Technology Assessment Is Performed by Payers, Too Radiology, March 1, 2008; 246(3): 984 - 985. [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. S. Medina and C. C. Blackmore Evidence-based Radiology: Review and Dissemination Radiology, August 1, 2007; 244(2): 331 - 336. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]