HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Lee, S. W. Articles by Lee, S.-G. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Lee, S. W. Articles by Lee, S.-G.

Unenhanced CT for Assessment of Macrovesicular Hepatic Steatosis in Living Liver Donors: Comparison of Visual Grading with Liver Attenuation Index¹

¹ From the Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology (S.W.L., S.H.P., K.W.K., E.K.C., Y.M.S., P.N.K.), Department of Diagnostic Pathology (E.S.Y.), and Division of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Department of Surgery (S.H., S.G.L.), University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 388-1 Poongnap-dong, Songpa-gu, Seoul 138-736, Korea; Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam-si, Korea (K.H.L.); and Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY (E.K.C.). Received July 7, 2006; revision requested September 6; revision received September 26; accepted October 31; final version accepted December 22. Address correspondence to S.H.P. (e-mail: seongho{at}amc.seoul.kr).

Purpose: To retrospectively compare the accuracy of visual grading and the liver attenuation index in the computed tomographic (CT) diagnosis of 30% or higher macrovesicular steatosis in living hepatic donors, by using histologic analysis as the reference standard.

Materials and Methods: Institutional review board approval was obtained with waiver of informed consent. Of 703 consecutive hepatic donor candidates, 24 patients (22 men and two women; mean age ± standard deviation, 36.3 years ± 9.7) who had 30% or higher macrovesicular steatosis at histologic analysis and same-day CT with subsequent needle biopsy in the right hepatic lobe (at least two samples per patient) were evaluated. An age- and sex-matched control group of 24 subjects included those who had less than 30% macrovesicular steatosis but otherwise met the same criteria as the patient group. A diagnostically difficult setting was made by selecting those with the highest degree of macrovesicular steatosis when there were multiple control subjects matched for a particular subject in the patient group. Two independent radiologists assessed steatosis of the right hepatic lobe by using two methods: a five-point visual grading system that used attenuation comparison between the liver and hepatic vessels and the liver attenuation index (CT_L-S), defined as hepatic attenuation minus splenic attenuation and calculated with region of interest measurements of hepatic attenuation. Interobserver agreement was assessed. Accuracy in the diagnosis of 30% or higher macrovesicular steatosis was compared by using a multireader, multicase receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.

Results: For visual grading, = 0.905 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.834, 0.976). Intraclass correlation coefficient for CT_L-S was 0.962 (95% CI: 0.893, 0.983). The area under the ROC curve of visual grading and CT_L-S were 0.927 (95% CI: 0.822, 1) and 0.929 (95% CI: 0.874, 0.983), respectively, indicating no statistically significant difference (P = .975).

Conclusion: Both visual grading and CT_L-S are highly reliable and similarly accurate in the diagnosis of 30% or higher macrovesicular steatosis in living hepatic donor candidates.

© RSNA, 2007