Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2443052026
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Raymond, J.
Right arrow Articles by Trop, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Raymond, J.
Right arrow Articles by Trop, I.
(Radiology 2007;244:643-649.)
© RSNA, 2007


Evidence-based Radiology Series

The Practice of Ethics in the Era of Evidence-based Radiology1

Jean Raymond, MD and Isabelle Trop, MD, MPH

1 From the Department of Radiology, Interventional Neuroradiology Section (J.R.) and Breast Imaging Section (I.T.), Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Notre-Dame and St-Luc Hospitals, 1560 Sherbrooke East, Suite M8206, Montreal, QC, Canada, H2L 4M1. Received December 12, 2005; revision requested January 24, 2006; revision received February 13; final version accepted February 21. Address correspondence to J.R. (e-mail: dr_jean_raymond{at}hotmail.com).

Various methods to provide an ethical conscience in the modern practice of radiology are available, but they all require time and effort. Although this is part of a series dedicated to evidence-based radiology (EBR), this article cannot provide recommendations supported by evidence. However, the method we propose is inspired from the analytic process found in EBR. It emphasizes autonomous reflection; systematic identification of roles, motives, and consequences of current actions and organizations; clarification of aims and means; selection of principles and values; and equilibration, application, and validation. This personal process is followed by the search for common values shared by the group, in a rational, scientific context centered on preserving the patient-physician relationship. This method entails constant vigilance and repeated revisions, but the allowance of time to think about ethical matters can decrease confusion and moral perplexity. The result is a stronger moral personal identity and a brighter horizon for a satisfying professional life.

© RSNA, 2007




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
J. B. Kruskal, B. Siewert, S. W. Anderson, R. L. Eisenberg, and J. Sosna
Managing an Acute Adverse Event in a Radiology Department
RadioGraphics, July 6, 2008; (2008) 285085064.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2007 by the Radiological Society of North America.