Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2443061537
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Additional Figures
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Birnbaum, B. A.
Right arrow Articles by Babb, J. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Birnbaum, B. A.
Right arrow Articles by Babb, J. S.
(Radiology 2007;244:767-775.)
© RSNA, 2007


Experimental Studies

Renal Cyst Pseudoenhancement: Influence of Multidetector CT Reconstruction Algorithm and Scanner Type in Phantom Model1

Bernard A. Birnbaum, MD, Nicole Hindman, MD, Julie Lee, MD 2, and James S. Babb, PhD

1 From the Department of Radiology, New York University Medical Center, 560 First Ave, New York, NY 10016. From the 2005 RSNA Annual Meeting. Received September 5, 2006; revision requested November 8; revision received December 7; final version accepted January 8, 2007. Address correspondence to B.A.B. (e-mail: bernard.birnbaum{at}nyumc.org).

Purpose: To prospectively determine the dependence of renal cyst pseudoenhancement on multidetector computed tomographic (CT) scanner type and convolution kernel in a phantom model.

Materials and Methods: A customized anthropomorphic phantom was created to accept interchangeable 40-, 140-, and 240-HU renal inserts that contained stacked 0- and 50-HU cylindric cysts measuring 7, 10, and 15 mm in diameter. Each phantom and insert was scanned with five different multidetector CT scanners on five separate occasions by using 120 kVp, low and high tube current settings, 3.00–3.75-mm collimation, and standard and high-spatial-resolution kernels. A total of 2340 CT attenuation measurements were obtained by using standardized regions of interest. The effect of multidetector CT imaging regimen, tube current, cyst diameter, and renal attenuation on pseudoenhancement incidence was assessed by using generalized estimating equations based on a binary logistic regression model. Within this framework, a Bonferroni multiple comparison correction was used to assess pseudoenhancement frequency differences among imaging regimens.

Results: Pseudoenhancement occurred in both 0- and 50-HU cysts; was significantly correlated with multidetector CT imaging regimen (P < .0001), cyst diameter (P < .0001), and renal attenuation (P ≤ .032); and was independent of tube current (P > .3). When convolution kernels on specific scanners were compared, significant differences (P < .04) between kernels were identified with all five scanners in terms of observed pseudoenhancement incidence. Generational differences in equipment were noted, with pseudoenhancement incidence ranging from 1.7% to 8.3%, 1.7% to 16.7%, and 18.3% to 56.7% across relevant kernels for three scanners from one manufacturer.

Conclusion: Pseudoenhancement is strongly dependent on multidetector CT convolution kernel. Varying this parameter may mitigate this phenomenon, which is independent of volume-averaging effects.

Supplemental material: http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/full/244/3/767/DC1.

© RSNA, 2007




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
Z. J. Wang, F. V. Coakley, Y. Fu, B. N. Joe, S. Prevrhal, L. A. Landeras, E. M. Webb, and B. M. Yeh
Renal Cyst Pseudoenhancement at Multidetector CT: What Are the Effects of Number of Detectors and Peak Tube Voltage?
Radiology, September 1, 2008; 248(3): 910 - 916.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2007 by the Radiological Society of North America.