HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Revel, M.-P. Articles by Frija, G. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Revel, M.-P. Articles by Frija, G.

Is It Possible to Recognize Pulmonary Infarction on Multisection CT Images?¹

¹ From the Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France (M.P.R., R.T., G.C., S.C., N.H., A.H., C.D., G.F.); Department of Radiology (M.P.R., R.T., S.C., N.H., A.H., G.F.), Clinical Research Unit (G.C.), and Laboratory of Anatomy and Pathology (C.D.), Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, 20 rue Leblanc, F75015 Paris, France; and Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France (M.P.R., R.T., G.C., S.C., N.H., A.H., C.D., G.F.). Received May 16, 2006; revision requested July 12; revision received September 8; accepted October 12; final version accepted March 1, 2007. Address correspondence to M.P.R. (e-mail: marie-pierre.revel{at}egp.aphp.fr).

Purpose: To retrospectively determine sensitivity and specificity of four findings for distinguishing pulmonary infarction from other causes of peripheral pulmonary consolidations on multidetector computed tomographic (CT) images, with other CT and clinical findings as reference.

Materials and Methods: Institutional review board approved the study and waived informed consent. Three independent radiologists blindly analyzed selected multisection CT images of 50 pulmonary infarctions—not showing direct arterial signs of pulmonary embolism—and 100 peripheral consolidations of other origins. Readers analyzed four findings: triangular shape, vessel sign (defined as presence of an enlarged vessel at the apex of consolidation), central lucencies, and air bronchograms. Interobserver agreement; frequency on CT images with and without infarct; and sensitivity, specificity, and positive likelihood ratio (LR) for diagnosis of pulmonary infarction were assessed for each finding.

Results: One hundred fifty peripheral consolidations were analyzed in 134 (75 men, 59 women) patients (mean age, 55.9 years ± 17.4 [standard deviation] vs 54.7 ± 19.9; P = .71). Interobserver agreement was good for central lucencies and air bronchograms and poor to moderate for the other two findings ( < 0.61). Compared with CT images without infarct, CT images with infarct had a higher frequency of vessel sign (32% [16 of 50] vs 11% [11 of 100], P = .029) and central lucencies (46% [23 of 50] vs 2% [two of 100], P < .001) and a lower frequency of air bronchograms (8% [four of 50] vs 40% [40 of 100], P = .003). Frequency of triangular shape was similar in both groups (52% [26 of 50] vs 40% [40 of 100], P = .17). Positive LR was 23.0 for central lucencies, 2.9 for vessel sign, 1.3 for triangular shape, and 0.2 for air bronchograms. Presence of central lucencies had 98% specificity and 46% sensitivity for pulmonary infarction. When the vessel sign and negative air bronchogram were combined with central lucencies, specificity increased to 99% but sensitivity decreased to 14%.

Conclusion: Central lucencies in peripheral consolidations are highly suggestive of pulmonary infarction.

© RSNA, 2007