Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2443061520
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jang, H.-J.
Right arrow Articles by Wilson, S. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jang, H.-J.
Right arrow Articles by Wilson, S. R.
(Radiology 2007;244:898-906.)
© RSNA, 2007


Ultrasonography

Enhancement Patterns of Hepatocellular Carcinoma at Contrast-enhanced US: Comparison with Histologic Differentiation1

Hyun-Jung Jang, MD, Tae Kyoung Kim, MD, Peter N. Burns, PhD, and Stephanie R. Wilson, MD

1 From the Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Toronto General Hospital, 585 University Ave, Toronto, ON, Canada M5G 2N2 (H.J.J., T.K.K., S.R.W.); and Department of Medical Imaging Research, Sunnybrook and Women's Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada (P.N.B.). From the 2005 RSNA Annual Meeting. Received September 1, 2006; revision requested October 30; revision received November 22; final version accepted January 11, 2007. Address correspondence to H.J.J. (e-mail: hyun-jung.jang{at}uhn.on.ca).

Purpose: To retrospectively compare the arterial and portal venous phase enhancement patterns of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) at contrast material–enhanced ultrasonography (US) with the degree of HCC histologic differentiation.

Materials and Methods: This study was approved by the research ethics board, and informed consent was obtained. The study population included 112 consecutive patients (91 men, 21 women; aged 25–86 years) with 112 histologically proved HCCs: 23 well differentiated, 77 moderately differentiated, and 12 poorly differentiated. All underwent continuous real-time low-mechanical-index contrast-enhanced US from wash-in of contrast material to 300 seconds by using a blood-pool microbubble agent. Initial image interpretation included arterial enhancement, dysmorphic intratumor arteries, and presence and time of negative enhancement (washout). Enhancement patterns were compared with histologic differentiation by using the Fisher exact test.

Results: In the arterial phase, 97 of 112 (87%) HCCs showed hypervascularity, with a significantly higher proportion in moderately differentiated HCCs (74 of 77, 96%) when compared with well- (14 of 23, 61%; P < .001) and poorly differentiated HCC (nine of 12, 75%; P < .004). Eight of 112 (7%) were isovascular and seven (6%) were hypovascular. Dysmorphic arteries were seen in 81 (72%) HCCs. Of 97 hypervascular tumors, only 42 (43%) showed typical washout by 90 seconds. Late washout appeared in 25 (26%) HCCs in the 91–180 seconds phase and in 21 (22%) in the 181–300 seconds phase. The remaining nine showed no washout up to 300 seconds and seven (78%) were well-differentiated HCCs.

Conclusion: Moderately differentiated HCC generally shows classic enhancement features, while well- and poorly differentiated tumors account for most atypical variations. Extended observation in the portal phase is important as late washout occurs with slightly more frequency than washout in the conventionally defined portal venous phase.

© RSNA, 2007




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
B. Lanka, H.-J. Jang, T. K. Kim, P. N. Burns, and S. R. Wilson
Impact of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography in a Tertiary Clinical Practice
J. Ultrasound Med., December 1, 2007; 26(12): 1703 - 1714.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2007 by the Radiological Society of North America.