Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2453060737
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hoffman, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Kelloff, G. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hoffman, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Kelloff, G. J.
(Radiology 2007;245:645-660.)
© RSNA, 2007


Molecular Imaging Series

Regulatory and Reimbursement Challenges for Molecular Imaging1

John M. Hoffman, MD, Sanjiv S. Gambhir, MD, PhD, and Gary J. Kelloff, MD

1 From the Departments of Radiology and Neurology, University of Utah School of Medicine, 2000 Circle of Hope, Suite 2121, Salt Lake City, UT 84112-5550 (J.M.H.); Departments of Radiology and Bioengineering, Bio-X Program, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif (S.S.G.); and Cancer Imaging Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md (G.J.K.). Received April 27, 2006; revision requested June 27; revision received October 19; final version accepted December 1. Address correspondence to J.M.H.

Molecular imaging is being hailed as the next great advance for imaging. Since molecular imaging typically involves the use of specific imaging probes that are treated like drugs, they will require regulatory approval. As with any drug, molecular imaging probes and techniques will also require thorough assessment in clinical trials to show safety and efficacy. The timeline for the regulatory approval will be long and potentially problematic because of the mounting costs of obtaining final regulatory approval. The current article is a detailed review of the regulatory and reimbursement process that will be required for molecular imaging probes and techniques to become a widespread clinical reality. The role of molecular imaging in the therapeutic drug discovery process will also be reviewed, as this is where these exciting new techniques have the potential to revolutionize the drug discovery and development process and, it is hoped, make it less costly. [18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-2-D-glucose positron emission tomography, one of the first molecular imaging techniques to be widely used, will be used as an example to illustrate the process of obtaining eventual reimbursement for widespread clinical use.

© RSNA, 2007




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
M. A. Pantaleo, M. Nannini, A. Maleddu, S. Fanti, C. Nanni, S. Boschi, F. Lodi, G. Nicoletti, L. Landuzzi, P. L. Lollini, et al.
Experimental results and related clinical implications of PET detection of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFr) in cancer
Ann. Onc., February 1, 2009; 20(2): 213 - 226.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]