Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2453062061
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Appendix E1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jansen, S. A.
Right arrow Articles by Karczmar, G. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jansen, S. A.
Right arrow Articles by Karczmar, G. S.
(Radiology 2007;245:684-691.)
© RSNA, 2007


Breast Imaging

Pure Ductal Carcinoma in Situ: Kinetic and Morphologic MR Characteristics Compared with Mammographic Appearance and Nuclear Grade1

Sanaz A. Jansen, MSc, Gillian M. Newstead, MD, Hiroyuki Abe, MD, PhD, Akiko Shimauchi, MD, Robert A. Schmidt, MD, and Gregory S. Karczmar, PhD

1 From the Department of Radiology, University of Chicago, 5841 S Maryland Ave, MC 2026, Chicago, IL 60637. Received December 4, 2006; revision requested January 29, 2007; revision received March 1; accepted April 11; final version accepted June 1. Supported by the Segal Foundation, Biological Sciences Division at the University of Chicago, Department of Defense grant W81XWH-06-1-0329, and National Institutes of Health grants R21 CA104774-01A2 and 2 R01 CA078803-05A2. Address correspondence to G.M.N. (e-mail: gnewstead{at}radiology.bsd.uchicago.edu).

Purpose: To retrospectively compare the kinetic and morphologic characteristics of pure ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) lesions depicted on dynamic contrast material–enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) images with the nuclear grade and conventional mammographic appearance of these lesions.

Materials and Methods: This HIPAA-compliant retrospective study was institutional review board approved, and informed patient consent was waived. Seventy-eight patients with 79 histologically proved pure DCIS lesions were selected. There were 17 low-nuclear-grade, 26 intermediate-nuclear-grade, 30 high-nuclear-grade, and six unclassified lesions. Sixty-five lesions were classified as fine pleomorphic, fine linear, or fine linear-branching calcifications (n = 31); amorphous or indistinct calcifications (n = 18); noncalcified mass (n = 10); or occult (n = 6) at conventional (x-ray) mammography. One experienced radiologist analyzed lesion morphology and kinetic curve shape according to the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System lexicon. Initial enhancement percentage, time to peak enhancement (Tpeak), and signal enhancement ratio (a measure of washout) were calculated for each lesion.

Results: Of the 79 pure DCIS lesions, 20 (25%) exhibited enhancement plateau curves and 35 (44%) exhibited washout curves. The lesions with a masslike appearance on mammograms exhibited more suspicious kinetic characteristics (mean Tpeak ~ 2 minutes) than did the lesions with amorphous or indistinct calcifications (mean Tpeak = 4.4 minutes). There was no significant difference in enhancement kinetic properties across the nuclear grades. Lesion morphology was predominantly nonmass, with clumped or heterogeneous enhancement in a segmental or linear distribution.

Conclusion: The pure DCIS lesions exhibited washout, plateau, and persistent enhancement curves. Enhancement kinetic characteristics varied with mammographic appearance but not with nuclear grade.

Supplemental material: http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/full/245/3/684/DC1

© RSNA, 2007







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2007 by the Radiological Society of North America.