HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Oncel, D. Articles by Tastan, A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Oncel, D. Articles by Tastan, A.

Effectiveness of Dual-Source CT Coronary Angiography for the Evaluation of Coronary Artery Disease in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: Initial Experience¹

¹ From the Department of Radiology, Sifa Medical Center, Fevzipasa Boulevard No. 172/2, 35340 Basmane Izmir, Turkey. Received January 14, 2007; revision requested March 15; revision received March 23; accepted April 25; final version accepted June 11. Address correspondence to D.O. (e-mail: dilekoncel{at}hotmail.com).

Purpose: To prospectively evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of dual-source CT for significant coronary stenosis (>50% narrowing) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), by using conventional coronary angiography as the reference standard.

Materials and Methods: Institutional Review Board approval and informed consent were obtained. Fifteen consecutive patients (nine men, six women; mean age, 58.47 years) were examined. Image quality (good, moderate, or poor) and significant stenosis (>50%) were evaluated by two radiologists blinded to the conventional coronary angiography results. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive values (NPV) were calculated. McNemar test was used to search for any significant difference between dual-source CT and conventional coronary angiography in helping detect coronary stenosis. statistics were calculated for intermodality and interobserver agreement.

Results: Sixteen segments by reader 1 and 13 segments by reader 2 were considered as poor image quality and rejected for further analysis. All segments with good image quality were correctly diagnosed. The respective overall sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV values were 87%, 98%, 77%, and 99% for reader 1 and 80%, 99%, 80%, and 99% for reader 2. No significant difference between dual-source CT and conventional coronary angiography was found in helping detect significant stenosis. statistics demonstrated good intermodality and excellent interobserver agreement.

Conclusion: Dual-source CT technology provides a temporal resolution that allows CT coronary angiography at higher heart rates and even with AF.

© RSNA, 2007

This article has been cited by other articles:

				H. Matsumoto, T. Kondo, S. Watanabe, R. Kikumoto, T. Shimada, Y. Hiraoka, and K. Ueda ECG-Edited Middiastolic Phase Reconstruction Improves Image Quality at 64-MDCT Coronary Angiography of Patients with Atrial Fibrillation Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2008; 191(6): 1659 - 1666. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Niinuma, R. T. George, A. Arbab-Zadeh, J. A.C. Lima, and C. A. Henrikson Imaging of pulmonary veins during catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: the role of multi-slice computed tomography Europace, November 1, 2008; 10(suppl_3): iii14 - iii21. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Dewey, D. Oncel, G. Oncel, and A. Tastan Coronary CT Angiography in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation Radiology, August 1, 2008; 248(2): 701 - 702. [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. A. Bluemke, S. Achenbach, M. Budoff, T. C. Gerber, B. Gersh, L. D. Hillis, W. G. Hundley, W. J. Manning, B. F. Printz, M. Stuber, et al. Noninvasive Coronary Artery Imaging: Magnetic Resonance Angiography and Multidetector Computed Tomography Angiography: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association Committee on Cardiovascular Imaging and Intervention of the Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention, and the Councils on Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Disease in the Young Circulation, July 29, 2008; 118(5): 586 - 606. [Full Text] [PDF]