Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print October 19, 2007, 10.1148/radiol.2453061366
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2453061366v1
246/1/249    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Baltes, C.
Right arrow Articles by Boesiger, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Baltes, C.
Right arrow Articles by Boesiger, P.
(Radiology 2008;246:249-257.)
© RSNA, 2007


Technical Developments

Determination of Peak Velocity in Stenotic Areas: Echocardiography versus k-t SENSE Accelerated MR Fourier Velocity Encoding1

Christof Baltes, PhD, Michael S. Hansen, PhD, Jeffrey Tsao, PhD, Sebastian Kozerke, PhD, Reza Rezavi, MD, Erik M. Pedersen, MD, and Peter Boesiger, PhD

1 From the Institute for Biomedical Engineering, University and Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich, Wolfgang-Pauli-Str 10, CH-8093 Zurich, Switzerland (C.B., S.K., P.B.); Division of Imaging Sciences, Guy's Hospital, King's College, London, England (M.S.H., R.R.); Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, Cambridge, Mass (J.T.); and MR-Centre, Aarhus University Hospital, Skejby, Aarhus, Denmark (E.M.P.). Received August 7, 2006; revision requested October 13; revision received December 22; accepted January 23, 2007; final version accepted April 2. Supported by the Strategic Excellence Project Life Sciences (grant TH7/02-2) of the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich, the Danish Heart Foundation (grant #02-2-3-43-22021), and Philips Medical Systems, Best, the Netherlands. Address correspondence to C.B. (e-mail: baltes{at}biomed.ee.ethz.ch).

The study was approved by the local ethical committees, and informed consent from each participant was obtained. The purpose of the study was to compare accelerated magnetic resonance (MR) Fourier velocity encoding (FVE), MR phase-contrast velocity mapping, and echocardiography with respect to peak velocity determination in vascular or valvular stenoses. FVE data collection was accelerated by using the k-space and time sensitivity encoding, or k-t SENSE, technique. Peak velocities were evaluated in five healthy volunteers (one woman, four men; mean age, 28 years; range, 23–34 years), three patients with stenotic aortic valves (two women, one man; mean age, 67 years; range, 39–82 years), two patients with pulmonary valvular stenosis (a 14-year-old girl and a 36-year-old man), and two patients with aortic stenosis (two women aged 18 and 27 years). In volunteers, peak velocity determined by the different methods agreed well. In patients, similar peak velocities were obtained by using accelerated MR FVE and echocardiography, while phase-contrast MR imaging results tended to underestimate these values.

© RSNA, 2007







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2007 by the Radiological Society of North America.