Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print January 7, 2008, 10.1148/radiol.2462070536
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Appendix E1
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2462070536v1
246/2/508    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Willmann, J. K.
Right arrow Articles by Gambhir, S. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Willmann, J. K.
Right arrow Articles by Gambhir, S. S.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article
(Radiology 2008;246:508-518.)
© RSNA, 2008


Molecular Imaging

US Imaging of Tumor Angiogenesis with Microbubbles Targeted to Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor Type 2 in Mice1

Jürgen K. Willmann, MD, Ramasamy Paulmurugan, PhD, Kai Chen, PhD, Olivier Gheysens, MD, Martin Rodriguez-Porcel, MD, Amelie M. Lutz, MD, Ian Y. Chen, MSE, Xiaoyuan Chen, PhD, and Sanjiv S. Gambhir, MD, PhD

1 From the Molecular Imaging Program at Stanford, Department of Radiology and Bio-X Program (J.K.W., R.P., K.C., O.G., M.R., A.M.L., I.Y.C., X.C., S.S.G.), and Department of Bioengineering (I.Y.C., S.S.G.), Stanford University School of Medicine, the James H. Clark Center, 318 Campus Dr, East Wing, 1st Floor, Stanford, CA 94305-5427. Received January 15, 2007; revision requested May 23; revision received June 9; final version accepted August 1. Supported by the Swiss Foundation of Medical-Biological Grants (J.K.W.); Novartis Research Foundation (J.K.W.); Swiss Society of Radiology (J.K.W.); in part by grants NCI SAIRP (S.S.G.), NHLBI 1 R01 HL078632 (S.S.G.), NCI ICMIC CA114747 P50 (S.S.G.); and the Canary Foundation. Address correspondence to S.S.G. (e-mail: sgambhir{at}stanford.edu).

Purpose: To prospectively evaluate contrast material–enhanced ultrasonography (US) with microbubbles targeted to vascular endothelial growth factor receptor type 2 (VEGFR2) for imaging tumor angiogenesis in two murine tumor models.

Materials and Methods: Animal protocols were approved by the Institutional Administrative Panel on Laboratory Animal Care. A US contrast agent, consisting of encapsulated gaseous microbubbles, was developed specifically to bind to VEGFR2 (by using anti-VEGFR2 antibodies and biotin-streptavidin interaction) which is up-regulated on endothelial cells of tumor blood vessels. VEGFR2-targeted microbubbles (MBV), control microbubbles (MBC), and nonlabeled microbubbles (MBN) were tested for binding specificity on cells expressing VEGFR2 (mouse angiosarcoma SVR cells) and control cells (mouse skeletal myoblast C2C12 cells). Expression of mouse VEGFR2 in culture cells was tested with immunocytochemical and Western blot analysis. Contrast-enhanced US imaging with MBV and MBC was performed in 28 tumor-bearing nude mice (mouse angiosarcoma, n = 18; rat malignant glioma, n = 10). Differences were calculated by using analysis of variance.

Results: In cell culture, adherence of MBV on SVR cells (2.1 microbubbles per SVR cell) was significantly higher than adherence of control microbubbles (0.01–0.10 microbubble per SVR cell; P < .001) and significantly more MBV attached to SVR cells than to C2C12 cells (0.15 microbubble per C2C12 cell; P < .001). In vivo, contrast-enhanced US imaging showed significantly higher average video intensity when using MBV compared with MBC for angiosarcoma and malignant glioma tumors (P < .001). Results of immunohistochemical analysis confirmed VEGFR2 expression on vascular endothelial cells of both tumor types.

Conclusion: US imaging with contrast microbubbles targeted to VEGFR2 allows noninvasive visualization of VEGFR2 expression in tumor vessels in mice.

© RSNA, 2008

Supplemental material: http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/full/2462070536/DC1


Related Article

Can Contrast-enhanced US with Targeted Microbubbles Monitor the Response to Antiangiogenic Therapies?
Jonathan B. Kruskal
Radiology 2008 246: 339-340. [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J. K. Willmann, Z. Cheng, C. Davis, A. M. Lutz, M. L. Schipper, C. H. Nielsen, and S. S. Gambhir
Targeted Microbubbles for Imaging Tumor Angiogenesis: Assessment of Whole-Body Biodistribution with Dynamic Micro-PET in Mice
Radiology, October 1, 2008; 249(1): 212 - 219.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J. K. Willmann, A. M. Lutz, R. Paulmurugan, M. R. Patel, P. Chu, J. Rosenberg, and S. S. Gambhir
Dual-targeted Contrast Agent for US Assessment of Tumor Angiogenesis in Vivo
Radiology, September 1, 2008; 248(3): 936 - 944.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
W. Cai and X. Chen
Multimodality Molecular Imaging of Tumor Angiogenesis
J. Nucl. Med., June 1, 2008; 49(Suppl_2): 113S - 128S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2008 by the Radiological Society of North America.