Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2463060881
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kuhl, C. K.
Right arrow Articles by Schild, H. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kuhl, C. K.
Right arrow Articles by Schild, H. H.
(Radiology 2008;246:675-696.)
© RSNA, 2008


State of the Art

Whole-Body High-Field-Strength (3.0-T) MR Imaging in Clinical Practice

Part I. Technical Considerations and Clinical Applications1

Christiane K. Kuhl, MD, Frank Träber, PhD, and Hans H. Schild, MD

1 From the Department of Radiology, University of Bonn, Sigmund-Freud-Str 25, 53105 Bonn, Germany. Received May 22, 2006; revision requested July 21; revision received September 11; accepted October 12; final version accepted December 5; final review and update by C.K.K. October 8, 2007. Address correspondence to C.K.K. (e-mail: kuhl{at}uni-bonn.de).

In the year 2002, magnetic field strength of more than 2 T was cleared for clinical patient care. Since then, an increasing number of magnetic resonance (MR) systems operating at a field strength of 3.0 T (and higher) have been installed worldwide. This article is the first of a two-part series on clinical high-field-strength MR imaging. Some basic physical effects of higher magnetic fields as they pertain to clinical MR imaging and spectroscopy are reviewed, from the perspective of a clinical radiologist, and strategies that are useful to avoid magnetic field–related difficulties and artifacts are discussed. Advantages and downsides, which can be expected for clinical MR, are presented and compared with the current level of evidence based on published data about MR of the brain and MR angiography. In the second part of the series, clinical applications regarding cardiac, breast, musculoskeletal, abdominopelvic, and pediatric MR and MR spectroscopy will be presented.

© RSNA, 2008




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
F. G. Shellock and A. Spinazzi
MRI Safety Update 2008: Part 2, Screening Patients for MRI
Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2008; 191(4): 1140 - 1149.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2008 by the Radiological Society of North America.