Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print April 10, 2008, 10.1148/radiol.2473071013
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2473071013v1
247/3/706    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Andreisek, G.
Right arrow Articles by Nanz, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Andreisek, G.
Right arrow Articles by Nanz, D.
(Radiology 2008;247:706-716.)
© RSNA, 2008


Experimental Studies

Direct MR Arthrography at 1.5 and 3.0 T: Signal Dependence on Gadolinium and Iodine Concentrations—Phantom Study1

Gustav Andreisek, MD, Johannes M. Froehlich, PhD, Juerg Hodler, MD, MBA, Dominik Weishaupt, MD, Verena Beutler, RT, Christian W. A. Pfirrmann, MD, Chris Boesch, MD, PhD, and Daniel Nanz, PhD

1 From the Institute for Diagnostic Radiology (G.A., D.W.) and Department of Medical Radiology (D.N.), University Hospital Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland; Guerbet, Zurich, Switzerland (J.M.F.); Department of Radiology, Orthopedic University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland (J.H., C.W.A.P.); and Department of Clinical Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland (V.B., C.B.). Received June 11, 2007; revision requested August 20; revision received October 3; final version accepted December 16. Address correspondence to G.A. (e-mail: gustav{at}andreisek.de).

Purpose: To prospectively quantify in vitro the influence of gadopentetate dimeglumine and ioversol on the magnetic resonance (MR) imaging signal observed with a variety of musculoskeletal pulse sequences to predict optimum gadolinium concentrations for direct MR arthrography at 1.5 and 3.0 T.

Materials and Methods: In an in vitro study, T1 and T2 relaxation times of three dilution series of gadopentetate dimeglumine (concentration, 0–20.0 mmol gadolinium per liter) at ioversol concentrations with iodine concentration of 0, 236.4, and 1182 mmol iodine per liter (corresponding to 0, 30, and 150 mg of iodine per milliliter) were measured at 1.5 and 3.0 T. The relaxation rate dependence on concentrations of gadolinium and iodine was analytically modeled, and continuous profiles of signal versus gadolinium concentration were calculated for 10 pulse sequences used in current musculoskeletal imaging. After fitting to experimental discrete profiles, maximum signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), gadolinium concentration with maximum SNR, and range of gadolinium concentration with 90% of maximum SNR were derived. The overall influence of field strength and iodine concentration on these parameters was assessed by using t tests. The deviation of simulated from experimental signal-response profiles was assessed with the autocorrelation of the residuals.

Results: The model reproduced relaxation rates of 0.37–38.24 sec–1, with a mean error of 4.5%. Calculated SNR profiles matched the discrete experimental profiles, with autocorrelation of the residuals divided by the mean of less than 5.0. Admixture of ioversol consistently reduced T1 and T2, narrowed optimum gadolinium concentration ranges (P = .004–.006), and reduced maximum SNR (P < .001 to not significant). Optimum gadolinium concentration was 0.7–3.4 mmol/L at both field strengths. At 3.0 T, maximum SNR was up to 75% higher than at 1.5 T.

Conclusion: Admixture of ioversol to gadopentetate dimeglumine solutions results in a consistent additional relaxation enhancement, which can be analytically modeled to allow a near-quantitative a priori optimized match of contrast media concentrations and imaging protocol for a broad variety of pulse sequences.

© RSNA, 2008







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2008 by the Radiological Society of North America.