Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print April 15, 2008, 10.1148/radiol.2472070123
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2472070123v1
247/3/779    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lisy, M.-R.
Right arrow Articles by Hilger, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lisy, M.-R.
Right arrow Articles by Hilger, I.
(Radiology 2008;247:779-787.)
© RSNA, 2008


Molecular Imaging

In Vivo Near-infrared Fluorescence Imaging of Carcinoembryonic Antigen–expressing Tumor Cells in Mice1

Marcus-René Lisy, PhD, Annika Goermar, Claudia Thomas, Jutta Pauli, PhD, Ute Resch-Genger, PhD, Werner A. Kaiser, MD, MS, and Ingrid Hilger, PhD

1 From the Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, FZL Erlanger Allee 101, D-07747 Jena, Germany (M.R.L., A.G., C.T., W.A.K., I.H.); and Federal Institute for Materials Research and Testing (BAM), Working Group Optical Spectroscopy, Berlin, Germany (J.P., U.R.). Received January 18, 2007; revision requested March 22; revision received July 17; accepted August 17; final version accepted October 29. Supported by Doktor-Robert-Pfleger Foundation. Address correspondence to I.H. (e-mail: Ingrid.Hilger{at}med.uni-jena.de).

Purpose: To prospectively depict carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA)-expressing tumors in mice with a high-affinity probe consisting of a near-infrared (NIR) fluorochrome and the clinically used anti-CEA antibody fragment arcitumomab.

Materials and Methods: This study was approved by the regional animal committee. By coupling a NIR fluorescent (NIRF) cyanine dye (DY-676) to a specific antibody fragment directed against CEA (arcitumomab) and a nonspecific IgG Fab fragment, a bio-optical high-affinity fluorescent probe (anti-CEA–DY-676) and a low-affinity fluorescent probe (FabIgG–DY-676) were designed. The dye-to-protein ratios were determined, and both probes were tested for NIRF imaging in vitro on CEA-expressing LS-174T human colonic adenocarcinoma cells and CEA-nonexpressing A-375 human melanoma cells by using a bio-optical NIR small-animal imager. In vivo data of xenografted LS-174T and A-375 tumors in mice (n = 10) were recorded and statistically analyzed (Student t test).

Results: The dye-to-protein ratios were determined as 3.0–3.5 for both probes. In vitro experiments revealed the specific binding of the anti-CEA–DY-676 probe on CEA-expressing cells as compared with CEA-nonexpressing cells; the FabIgG–DY-676 probe showed a markedly lower binding affinity to cells. In vivo LS-174T tumors xenografted in all mice could be significantly distinguished from A-375 tumors with application of the anti-CEA–DY-676 but not with that of the FabIgG–DY-676 at different times (2–24 hours, P < .005) after intravenous injection of the probes. Semiquantitative analysis revealed maximal fluorescence signals of anti-CEA–DY-676 to CEA-expressing tumors about 8 hours after injection.

Conclusion: Findings of this study indicate the potential use of the high-affinity probe anti-CEA–DY-676 for specific NIRF imaging in in vivo tumor diagnosis.

© RSNA, 2008







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2008 by the Radiological Society of North America.