Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2481071069
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schindera, S. T.
Right arrow Articles by Merkle, E. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schindera, S. T.
Right arrow Articles by Merkle, E. M.
(Radiology 2008;248:140-147.)
© RSNA, 2008

Genitourinary Imaging

Effect of Echo Time Pair Selection on Quantitative Analysis for Adrenal Tumor Characterization with In-Phase and Opposed-Phase MR Imaging: Initial Experience1

Sebastian T. Schindera, MD, Brian J. Soher, PhD, David M. Delong, PhD, Brian M. Dale, PhD, and Elmar M. Merkle, MD

1 From the Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Duke North, Room 1417, Erwin Rd, Durham, NC 27710 (S.T.S., B.J.S., D.M.D., E.M.M.); and Siemens Medical Solutions, Cary, NC (B.M.D.). Received June 18, 2007; revision requested August 27; revision received October 20; accepted January 7, 2008; final version accepted January 8. Address correspondence to E.M.M. (e-mail: elmar.merkle@duke.edu).

Purpose: To determine the effect of two pairs of echo times (TEs) for in-phase (IP) and opposed-phase (OP) 3.0-T magnetic resonance (MR) imaging on (a) quantitative analysis prospectively in a phantom study and (b) diagnostic accuracy retrospectively in a clinical study of adrenal tumors, with use of various reference standards in the clinical study.

Materials and Methods: A fat-saline phantom was used to perform IP and OP 3.0-T MR imaging for various fat fractions. The institutional review board approved this HIPAA-compliant study, with waiver of informed consent. Single-breath-hold IP and OP 3.0-T MR images in 21 patients (14 women, seven men; mean age, 63 years) with 23 adrenal tumors (16 adenomas, six metastases, one adrenocortical carcinoma) were reviewed. The MR protocol involved two acquisition schemes: In scheme A, the first OP echo (approximately 1.5-msec TE) and the second IP echo (approximately 4.9-msec TE) were acquired. In scheme B, the first IP echo (approximately 2.4-msec TE) and the third OP echo (approximately 5.8-msec TE) were acquired. Quantitative analysis was performed, and analysis of variance was used to test for differences between adenomas and nonadenomas.

Results: In the phantom study, scheme B did not enable discrimination among voxels that had small amounts of fat. In the clinical study, no overlap in signal intensity (SI) index values between adenomas and nonadenomas was seen (P < .05) with scheme A. However, with scheme B, no overlap in the adrenal gland SI–to–liver SI ratio between adenomas and nonadenomas was seen (P < .05). With scheme B, no overlap in adrenal gland SI index–to–liver SI index ratio between adenomas and nonadenomas was seen (P < .05).

Conclusion: This initial experience indicates SI index is the most reliable parameter for characterization of adrenal tumors with 3.0-T MR imaging when obtaining OP echo before IP echo. When acquiring IP echo before OP echo, however, nonadenomas can be mistaken as adenomas with use of the SI index value.

© RSNA, 2008