|
|
||||||||
Thoracic Imaging |
1 From the Departments of Radiology (Y.W., H.J.v.d.Z., D.M.X., A.L.M.L., M.O.) and Epidemiology (G.H.d.B.), University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9700 RB Groningen, the Netherlands; Departments of Pulmonology (R.J.v.K.) and Public Health (H.J.d.K.), Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Radiology, University of Utrecht Medical Center, Utrecht, the Netherlands (H.A.G., M.P.); Department of Radiology, Kennemer Gasthuis, Haarlem, the Netherlands (E.T.S.); and Department of Radiology, University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium (J.V.). From the 2006 RSNA Annual Meeting. Received June 4, 2007; revision requested August 6; revision received January 10, 2008; final version accepted February 21, 2008. Address correspondence to M.O. (e-mail: m.oudkerk{at}rad.umcg.nl).
Purpose: To retrospectively assess volume measurement variability in solid pulmonary nodules (volume, 15–500 mm3) detected at lung cancer screening and to quantify the independent effects of nodule morphology, size, and location.
Materials and Methods: This retrospective study was a substudy of the screening program that was approved by the Dutch Ministry of Health, and all participants provided written informed consent. Two independent readers used semiautomated software to measure the volume of pulmonary nodules detected in 6774 participants aged 50–75 years (5917 men). Nodules were classified according to their location (purely intraparenchymal, pleural based, juxtavascular, or fissure attached), morphology (smooth, polylobulated, spiculated, or irregular), and size (
50 mm3 or >50 mm3). The level of agreement was expressed by using the absolute values of the relative volume differences (RVDs). Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed, and odds ratios (ORs) were computed to quantify the independent effects of morphology, location, and size on RVD categories.
Results: Altogether, 4225 nodules in 2239 participants were included. Complete agreement in volume was obtained for 3646 (86%) of the nodules. Disagreement was small (absolute value of RVD < 5%) for 173 (4%) nodules, moderate (absolute value of RVD
5% but < 15%) for 232 (6%), and large (absolute value of RVD
15%) for 174 (4%). Multivariate analysis showed that the ORs of volume disagreement were 15.7, 3.1, and 1.9 for irregular, spiculated, and polylobulated nodules, respectively; 3.5, 2.6, and 2.1 for juxtavascular, pleural-based, and fissure-attached nodules, respectively; and 1.3 for large nodules compared with smooth, purely intraparenchymal, and small reference nodules.
Conclusion: Nodule morphology, location, and size influence volume measurement variability, particularly for juxtavascular and irregular nodules.
© RSNA, 2008
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Marchiano, E. Calabro, E. Civelli, G. Di Tolla, L. F. Frigerio, C. Morosi, F. Tafaro, E. Ferri, N. Sverzellati, T. Camerini, et al. Pulmonary Nodules: Volume Repeatability at Multidetector CT Lung Cancer Screening Radiology, June 1, 2009; 251(3): 919 - 925. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Brambilla From surgical to molecular scalpel: ERJ lung cancer series for 2009 Eur. Respir. J., January 1, 2009; 33(1): 9 - 10. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||