Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print June 6, 2008, 10.1148/radiol.2482070157

(Radiology 2008;248:531.)

A more recent version of this article appeared on August 1, 2008
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2482070157v1
248/2/531    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tamada, T.
Right arrow Articles by Fukunaga, M.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tamada, T.
Right arrow Articles by Fukunaga, M.
© RSNA, 2008

Genitourinary Imaging

Prostate Cancer: Relationships between Postbiopsy Hemorrhage and Tumor Detectability at MR Diagnosis1

Tsutomu Tamada, MD, PhD, Teruki Sone, MD, PhD, Yoshimasa Jo, MD, PhD, Akira Yamamoto, MD, Takenori Yamashita, MD, PhD, Naoto Egashira, MD, Shigeki Imai, MD, PhD, and Masao Fukunaga, MD, PhD

1 From the Departments of Radiology (T.T., T.S., A.Y., T.Y., N.E., S.I., M.F.) and Urology (Y.J.), Kawasaki Medical School, 577 Matsushima, Kurashiki City, Okayama 701-0192, Japan. From the 2006 RSNA Annual Meeting. Received January 24, 2007; revision requested March 27; revision received August 1; accepted September 12; final version accepted February 19, 2008. Address correspondence to T.T. (e-mail: ttamada{at}med.kawasaki-m.ac.jp).

Purpose: To retrospectively evaluate the influence of postbiopsy hemorrhage on the accuracy of tumor detection at T2-weighted magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, dynamic contrast material–enhanced MR imaging, and diffusion-weighted (DW) MR imaging of prostate cancer, with histologic findings as the reference standard.

Materials and Methods: The institutional review board approved this study and waived the requirement for informed consent. Forty male patients aged 62–84 years (mean age, 71 years) who had prostate cancer underwent MR imaging of the prostate gland after ultrasonographically (US) guided systematic 12-core-specimen biopsy. The mean time between biopsy and MR imaging was 24 days (range, 6–54 days). T1-weighted, T2-weighted, dynamic contrast-enhanced, and DW imaging examinations were performed at 1.5 T. The prostate was divided, according to the biopsy sites, into eight regions on the MR images. Three reviewers in consensus evaluated each region for hemorrhage and prostate cancer. Statistical evaluations were performed with Mann-Whitney U, Ryan, and Spearman rank correlation tests.

Results: Intraglandular hemorrhage was observed in 38 (95%) patients and significantly more often in the peripheral zone (PZ) than in the transition zone (TZ) (P < .001). Degree of hemorrhage did not correlate significantly (P = .536) with time between biopsy and MR imaging. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of combined T2-weighted, dynamic contrast-enhanced, and DW imaging in the diagnosis of prostate cancer were 69%, 85%, and 78%, respectively. Sensitivity and specificity were lower for the TZ than for the PZ. Degree of hemorrhage was significantly lower in regions of positive biopsy findings than in regions of negative biopsy findings (P = .001) and correlated negatively with tumor size (P = .043).

Conclusion: Interpretation of combined T2-weighted, dynamic contrast-enhanced, and DW MR image findings can yield reasonable diagnostic accuracy in both the PZ (80% [191 of 240 regions]) and the TZ (74% [59 of 80 regions]).

© RSNA, 2008







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2008 by the Radiological Society of North America.