Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print June 13, 2008, 10.1148/radiol.2482071234

(Radiology 2008;248:571.)

A more recent version of this article appeared on August 1, 2008
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2482071234v1
248/2/571    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kijowski, R.
Right arrow Articles by De Smet, A. A.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kijowski, R.
Right arrow Articles by De Smet, A. A.
© RSNA, 2008

Musculoskeletal Imaging

Juvenile versus Adult Osteochondritis Dissecans of the Knee: Appropriate MR Imaging Criteria for Instability1

Richard Kijowski, MD, Donna G. Blankenbaker, MD, Kazuhiko Shinki, MS, Jason P. Fine, PhD, Ben K. Graf, MD, and Arthur A. De Smet, MD

1 From the Departments of Radiology (R.K., D.G.B., A.A.D.S.), Biostatistics (K.S., J.P.F.), and Orthopedic Surgery (B.K.G.), University of Wisconsin Hospital, Clinical Science Center E3/311, 600 Highland Ave, Madison, WI 53792-3252. From the 2006 RSNA Annual Meeting. Received July 13, 2007; revision requested September 10; revision received October 12; final version accepted January 28, 2008. Address correspondence to R.K. (e-mail: r.kijowski{at}hosp.wisc.edu).

Purpose: To retrospectively compare the sensitivity and specificity of previously described magnetic resonance (MR) imaging criteria for the detection of instability in patients with juvenile or adult osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) of the knee, with arthroscopic findings as the reference standard.

Materials and Methods: Informed consent was waived by the Institutional Review Board for this HIPAA-compliant study. The study group consisted of 32 skeletally immature patients (25 boys, seven girls; mean age, 14.4 years) with 36 juvenile OCD lesions of the knee and 33 skeletally mature patients (25 men, eight women; mean age, 26.2 years) with 34 adult OCD lesions of the knee. All patients had been evaluated with MR imaging and arthroscopy. MR studies were retrospectively reviewed by two radiologists in consensus to determine the presence of previously described MR imaging criteria for OCD instability (ie, high T2 signal intensity rim, surrounding cysts, high T2 signal intensity cartilage fracture line, and fluid-filled osteochondral defect). Sensitivity and specificity of the criteria were calculated separately for juvenile and adult OCD lesions.

Results: Separately, previously described MR imaging criteria for detection of OCD instability were 0%–88% sensitive and 21%–100% specific for juvenile OCD lesions and 27%–54% sensitive and 100% specific for adult OCD lesions. When used together, the criteria were 100% sensitive and 11% specific for instability in juvenile OCD lesions and 100% sensitive and 100% specific for instability in adult OCD lesions.

Conclusion: Previously described MR imaging criteria for OCD instability have high specificity for adult but not juvenile lesions of the knee.

© RSNA, 2008







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2008 by the Radiological Society of North America.