Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2483071515
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schwab, S. A.
Right arrow Articles by Wenkel, E.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schwab, S. A.
Right arrow Articles by Wenkel, E.
(Radiology 2008;249:54-61.)
© RSNA, 2008


Breast Imaging

Direct MR Galactography: Feasibility Study1

Siegfried A. Schwab , MD, Michael Uder, MD, Rüdiger Schulz-Wendtland, MD, Werner A. Bautz, MD, Rolf Janka, MD, and Evelyn Wenkel, MD

1 From the Department of Radiology, Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Maximiliansplatz 1, D-91054 Erlangen, Germany. From the 2007 RSNA Annual Meeting. Received August 27, 2007; revision requested October 31; revision received January 22, 2008; accepted February 26; final version accepted April 3. Address correspondence to S.A.S. (e-mail: siegfriedschwab{at}gmx.net).

Purpose: To compare T1- and T2-weighted direct magnetic resonance (MR) galactography, indirect MR galactography, and conventional galactography in women with pathologic nipple discharge.

Materials and Methods: The study was approved by the institutional review board. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients. Twenty-three women (age range, 30–85 years) with pathologic nipple discharge and pathologic conventional galactographic findings underwent physical examination, ultrasonography, and MR imaging before surgery. A T2-weighted sequence of the affected breast was performed before (indirect MR galactography), and T1- and T2-weighted sequences were performed after (direct MR galactography), gadopentetate dimeglumine was injected into the discharging duct. MR galactographic findings were analyzed and compared with conventional galactographic findings. Sequences used were T2-weighted three-dimensional constructive interference in steady state (CISS), T1-weighted volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination (VIBE), and T1-weighted fast low-angle shot (FLASH).

Results: The 23 patients had a total of 57 findings at conventional galactography. Indirect MR galactography with CISS showed pathologic findings in eight (42%) of 19 patients and showed 15 (33%) of 46 of all findings. Direct MR galactography with CISS showed pathologic findings in 23 (100%) of 23 patients and 47 (82%) of 57 of all findings, that with VIBE showed pathologic findings in 19 (83%) of 23 patients and 38 (67%) of 57 of all findings, and that with FLASH showed pathologic findings in 16 (100%) of 16 patients and 31 (80%) of 39 of all findings. There was a significant (P < .01) difference between indirect MR galactography and all direct MR galactography sequences in the detection of ductal disease. Eight (35%) of 23 women showed additional findings at direct MR galactography in comparison with standard MR imaging sequences.

Conclusion: MR galactography has the potential to be used in the diagnostic work-up of pathologic nipple discharge. Direct MR galactography shows more disease than does indirect MR galactography. The highest detection rate for ductal disease compared with that at conventional galactography was found with the direct MR galactography CISS and FLASH sequences.

© RSNA, 2008







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2008 by the Radiological Society of North America.