Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2483071453
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Min, J. K.
Right arrow Articles by Gilmore, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Min, J. K.
Right arrow Articles by Gilmore, A.
(Radiology 2008;249:62-70.)
© RSNA, 2008


Cardiac Imaging

Costs and Clinical Outcomes after Coronary Multidetector CT Angiography in Patients without Known Coronary Artery Disease: Comparison to Myocardial Perfusion SPECT1

James K. Min, MD, Ning Kang, MS, Leslee J. Shaw, PhD, Richard B. Devereux, MD, Matthew Robinson, MS, Fay Lin, MD, Antonio P. Legorreta, PhD, and Amanda Gilmore, MD

1 From the Greenberg Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York Presbyterian Hospital, 520 E 70th St, K415, New York, NY 10021 (J.K.M., R.B.D., F.L.); Health Benchmarks, Woodland Hills, Calif (N.K., M.R., A.P.L., A.G.); School of Public Health, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, Calif (A.P.L.); and Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Ga (L.J.S.). Received August 20, 2007; revision requested November 9; revision received December 22; accepted February 28, 2008; final version accepted March 13. Supported by an educational grant from GE Healthcare. Address correspondence to J.K.M.

Purpose: To assess costs and clinical outcomes in individuals without known coronary artery disease (CAD) who underwent multidetector computed tomographic (CT) angiography compared with those in matched patients who underwent myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT).

Materials and Methods: Data were captured from a deidentified, HIPAA-compliant data warehouse. We examined 1-year CAD costs (additional diagnostic coronary testing, CAD hospitalization, and coronary procedural and revascularization costs) and clinical outcomes in individuals without known CAD who underwent multidetector CT (n = 1647) compared with those in a matched cohort of patients who underwent myocardial perfusion SPECT (n = 6588). Cox proportional hazards models were employed for clinical outcome measures, including CAD hospitalization, myocardial infarction, and angina.

Results: Adjusted CAD costs in the multidetector CT group were 25.9% lower than in the myocardial perfusion SPECT group, by an average of $1075 (95% confidence interval [CI]: $243, $2570) per patient. Those in the multidetector CT group were more likely to undergo downstream testing with myocardial perfusion SPECT (odds ratio, 6.65; 95% CI: 5.05, 8.75; P < .001), while those in the myocardial perfusion SPECT group were more likely to undergo downstream testing with invasive angiography (odds ratio, 6.25; 95% CI: 4.35, 9.09; P < .001). The multidetector CT group was less likely to undergo coronary revascularization (hazard ratio, 0.76; 95% CI: 0.75, 0.77; P < .001) than the myocardial perfusion SPECT group. There was no significant difference between multidetector CT and myocardial perfusion SPECT groups for rates of myocardial infarction (0.4% for both) or CAD hospitalization (0.7% vs 1.1%, respectively), while rates of angina were significantly lower in the multidetector CT group (4.3% vs 6.4%, P < .001).

Conclusion: Individuals without known CAD who underwent multidetector CT as an initial diagnostic test, compared with those who underwent myocardial perfusion SPECT, incurred lower health care costs with similar rates of myocardial infarction and CAD-related hospitalization.

© RSNA, 2008




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J. M. May, W. P. Shuman, J. N. Strote, K. R. Branch, L. M. Mitsumori, D. W. Lockhart, and J. H. Caldwell
Low-Risk Patients With Chest Pain in the Emergency Department: Negative 64-MDCT Coronary Angiography May Reduce Length of Stay and Hospital Charges
Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2009; 193(1): 150 - 154.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
G. L. Raff, K. M. Chinnaiyan, D. A. Share, T. Y. Goraya, E. A. Kazerooni, M. Moscucci, R. E. Gentry, A. Abidov, and for the Advanced Cardiovascular Imaging Consortium
Radiation Dose From Cardiac Computed Tomography Before and After Implementation of Radiation Dose-Reduction Techniques
JAMA, June 10, 2009; 301(22): 2340 - 2348.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll Cardiol ImgHome page
S. Achenbach, V. Dilsizian, C. M. Kramer, and W. A. Zoghbi
The Year in Coronary Artery Disease
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Img., June 1, 2009; 2(6): 774 - 786.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ Cardiovasc ImagingHome page
J. K. Min and L. J. Shaw
Noninvasive Diagnostic and Prognostic Assessment of Individuals With Suspected Coronary Artery Disease: Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography Perspective
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging, November 1, 2008; 1(3): 270 - 281.
[Full Text] [PDF]