Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2492080017
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Plein, S.
Right arrow Articles by Kozerke, S.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Plein, S.
Right arrow Articles by Kozerke, S.
(Radiology 2008;249:493-500.)
© RSNA, 2008


Cardiac Imaging

k-Space and Time Sensitivity Encoding–accelerated Myocardial Perfusion MR Imaging at 3.0 T: Comparison with 1.5 T1

Sven Plein, MD, PhD, Juerg Schwitter, MD, Daniel Suerder, MD, John P. Greenwood, PhD, Peter Boesiger, PhD, and Sebastian Kozerke, PhD

1 From the Institute for Biomedical Engineering, University and ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland (S.P., P.B., S.K.); Academic Unit of Cardiovascular Medicine, G-floor Jubilee Wing, Leeds General Infirmary, Great George Street, Leeds LS1 3EX, United Kingdom (S.P., J.P.G.); and University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland (J.S., D.S.). Received January 4, 2008; revision requested February 14; revision received April 17; accepted April 28; final version accepted May 15. Supported by Philips Medical Systems (Best, the Netherlands) and Bayer Schering Pharma (Zurich, Switzerland). S.P. supported by a Wellcome Trust fellowship (grant no. GR078288RR). Address correspondence to S.P. (e-mail: s.plein{at}leeds.ac.uk).

Purpose: To determine the feasibility and diagnostic accuracy of high-spatial-resolution myocardial perfusion magnetic resonance (MR) imaging at 3.0 T by using k-space and time (k-t) domain undersampling with sensitivity encoding (SENSE), or k-t SENSE. Data were compared with results of k-t SENSE–accelerated high-spatial-resolution perfusion MR imaging at 1.5 T and standard-resolution acquisition at 3.0 T.

Materials and Methods: The study was reviewed and approved by the local ethics review board; informed consent was obtained. k-t SENSE perfusion MR imaging was performed at 1.5 and 3.0 T (fivefold k-t SENSE acceleration; spatial resolution, 1.3 x 1.3 x 10 mm). Fourteen volunteers were studied at rest; 37 patients were studied during adenosine-induced stress. In volunteers, comparison was also made with standard-resolution (2.5 x 2.5 x 10 mm) twofold SENSE perfusion MR imaging results at 3.0 T. Image quality, artifact scores, signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs), and contrast enhancement ratios were derived. In patients, diagnostic accuracy of visual analysis to detect stenosis of more than 50% narrowing in diameter at quantitative coronary angiography was determined by using receiver operator characteristic (ROC) analysis.

Results: In volunteers, image quality and artifact scores were similar for 3.0- and 1.5-T k-t SENSE perfusion MR imaging, while SNR was higher (11.6 vs 5.6) and contrast enhancement ratio was lower (1.1 vs 1.5, P = .012) at 3.0 T. Compared with standard-resolution perfusion MR imaging, image quality was higher for 3.0-T k-t SENSE (3.6 vs 3.1, P = .04), endocardial dark rim artifacts were reduced (artifact thickness, 1.6 vs 2.4 mm, P < .001), and contrast enhancement ratios were similar. In patients, areas under the ROC curve for detection of coronary stenosis were 0.89 and 0.80 (P = .21) for 3.0 and 1.5 T, respectively.

Conclusion: k-t SENSE–accelerated high-spatial-resolution perfusion MR imaging at 3.0 T is feasible, with similar artifacts and diagnostic accuracy as those at 1.5 T. Compared with standard-resolution twofold SENSE perfusion MR imaging, image quality at k-t SENSE MR imaging is improved and artifacts are reduced.

© RSNA, 2008







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2008 by the Radiological Society of North America.