HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Appendix E1 Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Google Scholar Articles by Brink, M. Articles by Blickman, J. G. PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Brink, M. Articles by Blickman, J. G. Related Collections Related Article

Arm Raising at Exposure-controlled Multidetector Trauma CT of Thoracoabdominal Region: Higher Image Quality, Lower Radiation Dose¹

¹ From the Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Geert Groote Plein 10, Internal no. (Huispost) 667, 6500 HB Nijmegen, the Netherlands (M.B., F.d.L., L.J.O., H.M.D., D.R.K., J.D., M.J.R.E., R.L.K., J.G.B.); and Department of Radiology, Vrije Universiteit Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (C.v.K.). Received January 25, 2008; revision requested April 1; revision received April 17; accepted May 14; final version accepted May 21. Address correspondence to M.B. (e-mail: M.Brink{at}rad.umcn.nl).

Purpose: To evaluate the effect of arm position on image quality and effective radiation dose in an automatic exposure-controlled (AEC) multidetector thoracoabdominal computed tomography (CT) protocol in trauma patients.

Materials and Methods: This retrospective study of the data of 177 trauma patients (117 male; median age, 39 years) was approved by the institutional ethics board, with informed patient consent waived. Patients underwent scanning by using an AEC 16-detector thoracoabdominal CT protocol in which both arms were raised above the shoulder region (standard-position group, 132 patients), one arm was raised and the other was down (one-arm group, 27 patients), or both arms were down (two-arm group, 18 patients). Objective and subjective image quality was assessed. Individual effective radiation dose was calculated from the effective tube current–time product per exposed section. For this purpose, section location–dependent conversion factors were derived by using a CT dosimetry calculator. The effect of arm position on effective dose was quantified by using linear regression analysis with correction for patient volume and attenuation.

Results: Compared with the image quality in the standard-position group, the image quality in the one- and two-arm groups was decreased but within acceptable diagnostic limits. The median corrected effective dose in the standard-position group was 18.6 mSv; the dose in the one-arm group was 18% (95% confidence interval: 11%, 25%) higher than this, and that in the two-arm group was 45% (95% confidence interval: 34%, 57%) higher.

Conclusion: Omitting arm raising results in lower but acceptable image quality and a substantially higher effective radiation dose. Hence, effort should be made to position the arms above the shoulder when scanning trauma patients.

Clinical trial registration no. NCT00228111 [ClinicalTrials.gov]

Supplemental material: http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/full/249/2/661/DC1

© RSNA, 2008

Related Article

Efforts for Lowering Radiation Dose Delivered with CT: Raising Arms, or Is There More?

Denis Tack and Pierre Alain Gevenois
Radiology 2008 249: 413-415. [Full Text] [PDF]