Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Published online before print November 10, 2008, 10.1148/radiol.2493080640
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2493080640v1
250/1/152    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wirth, S.
Right arrow Articles by Körner, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wirth, S.
Right arrow Articles by Körner, M.
(Radiology 2009;250:152-160.)
© RSNA, 2008

Medical Physics

Imaging Performance with Different Doses in Skeletal Radiography: Comparison of a Needle-structured and a Conventional Storage Phosphor System with a Flat-Panel Detector1

Stefan Wirth, MD, Marcus Treitl, MD, Maximilian F. Reiser, MD, and Markus Körner, MD

1 From the Department of Clinical Radiology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Nussbaumstr 20, 80336 Munich, Germany. Received April 7, 2008; revision requested May 30; revision received June 3; accepted June 28; final version accepted July 9. Address correspondence to S.W. (e-mail: Stefan.Wirth{at}med.uni-muenchen.de).

Purpose: To evaluate possible radiation dose reduction in the extremities with use of digital radiography and a needle-structured image plate (NIP) by comparing this technique with digital radiography performed with a powder-structured image plate (PIP) and a flat-panel detector (FPD).

Materials and Methods: This study was approved by the local review board. A total of 72 plain radiographs of the feet of six human cadavers were obtained with four surface entrance doses (65, 43, 20, and 10 µGy) by using three systems. The reference image of each specimen was obtained with an 85-µGy dose and with use of a PIP. Five independent blinded radiologists evaluated the images. The noise level and the depiction of the cortical bone, trabecular bone, and soft tissue were rated and compared with those of the reference image by using a five-point scale. An overall image score was developed for these four criteria by calculating the unweighted mean. The Wilcoxon test was used to assess differences between overall image scores.

Results: For each dose, NIP images were significantly superior (P < .001), whereas FPD images and PIP images were significantly inferior (P < .01). NIP images obtained with 65-, 43-, and 20-µGy doses were significantly superior to reference images and to FPD and PIP images obtained with a 65-µGy dose. There were no significant differences between reference images and FPD images obtained with 65- and 43-µGy doses.

Conclusion: Radiation dose can be reduced by 75% in clinical skeletal imaging of peripheral extremities by using NIP, with no significant loss of information. For FPD images, this might be possible with a dose reduction of 50%.

© RSNA, 2008