Radiology, Vol 186, 731-738, Copyright © 1993 by Radiological Society of North America

ARTICLES

Disk-caused nerve compression in patients with acute low-back pain: diagnosis with MR, CT myelography, and plain CT [published erratum appears in Radiology 1993 Jun;187(3):880]

JR Thornbury, DG Fryback, PA Turski, MJ Javid, JV McDonald, BR Beinlich, LR Gentry, JF Sackett, EJ Dasbach and PA Martin
Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison 53792-3252.

Ninety-five patients with acute low-back and radicular pain underwent magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and either plain computed tomography (CT) (n = 32) or CT myelography (n = 63) for diagnosis of herniated nucleus pulposus-caused nerve compression (HNPNC). Patients were followed up for at least 6-12 months. Fifty-six patients underwent surgery, and 39 received conservative treatment. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed on correlation of results of blinded image reading with "true" diagnoses determined by an expert panel [corrected]. Results in subgroup analysis for ROC curve areas were MR, 0.84, versus plain CT, 0.86; MR, 0.81, versus CT myelography, 0.83; and MR, 0.82, versus findings with both CT techniques, 0.85. Results indicate no statistically significant difference in diagnostic accuracy of HNPNC among the three modalities. Thus, factors of cost, radiation dose, and invasiveness influence selection of modality. On the basis of accuracy findings, the authors suggest that MR should replace CT myelography because of the invasiveness of myelography but that MR should not replace plain CT because plain CT is equally accurate and much less costly.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P. Bohy, V. de Maertelaer, A. Roquigny, C. Keyzer, D. Tack, and P. A. Gevenois Multidetector CT in Patients Suspected of Having Lumbar Disk Herniation: Comparison of Standard-Dose and Simulated Low-Dose Techniques Radiology, August 1, 2007; 244(2): 524 - 531. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J C van Rijn, N Klemetso, J B Reitsma, P M Bossuyt, F J Hulsmans, W C Peul, G J den Heeten, J Stam, and C B L M Majoie Observer variation in the evaluation of lumbar herniated discs and root compression: spiral CT compared with MRI Br. J. Radiol., May 1, 2006; 79(941): 372 - 377. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Gaeta, F. Minutoli, E. Scribano, G. Ascenti, S. Vinci, D. Bruschetta, L. Magaudda, and A. Blandino CT and MR Imaging Findings in Athletes with Early Tibial Stress Injuries: Comparison with Bone Scintigraphy Findings and Emphasis on Cortical Abnormalities Radiology, May 1, 2005; 235(2): 553 - 561. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. A. Obuchowski Special Topics III: Bias Radiology, December 1, 2003; 229(3): 617 - 621. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. G. Jarvik and R. A. Deyo Diagnostic Evaluation of Low Back Pain with Emphasis on Imaging Ann Intern Med, October 1, 2002; 137(7): 586 - 597. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. N. Weinstein A 45-Year-Old Man With Low Back Pain and a Numb Left Foot JAMA, August 26, 1998; 280(8): 730 - 736. [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. G. Newman, R. Birkenfeld, S. Warach, and R. R. Edelman Magnetic Resonance Imaging N. Engl. J. Med., August 5, 1993; 329(6): 434 - 435. [Full Text]

				P.-L. Westesson Reliability and Validity of Imaging Diagnosis of Temporomandibular Joint Disorder Advances in Dental Research, August 1, 1993; 7(2): 137 - 151. [Abstract] [PDF]