
View larger version (27K):
[in a new window]
|
Figure 1a. Graph shows linear regression analysis of mean percentages of renal artery stenosis, as measured by using MIP (x, dashed line) and VR ( , solid line) plotted against DSA. Dotted line indicates perfect agreement of MR angiography and DSA. (a) Graph shows a positive and high correlation with DSA for MIP (r2 = 0.83, P < .001) and VR (r2 = 0.96, P < .001) when all arteries were considered. (b) By using a cutoff of 50% stenosis, correlation between MIP and DSA decreases substantially (r2 = 0.38, P = .001), with no considerable change in the relationship between VR and DSA (r2 = 0.84, P < .001). (c) By using a cutoff of 70% stenosis, graph shows there is no statistically significant correlation between MIP and DSA (r2 = 0.21, P = .1), whereas a significant relationship (r2 = 0.83, P < .001) between VR and DSA was maintained.
|