Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print May 3, 2002, 10.1148/radiol.2233011079
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kim, T. S.
Right arrow Articles by Kim, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kim, T. S.
Right arrow Articles by Kim, S.
(Radiology 2002;223:695-701.)
© RSNA, 2002

Detection of Pulmonary Edema in Pigs: Storage Phosphor versus Amorphous Selenium-based Flat-Panel-Detector Radiography1

Tae Sung Kim, MD, Jung-Gi Im, MD, Jin Mo Goo, MD, Kyoung Ho Lee, MD, Yu-Jin Lee, MD, Se Hyung Kim, MD and Seonwoo Kim, PhD

1 From the Dept of Radiology, Samsung Med Ctr, Sungkyunkwan Univ School of Med, Seoul, Korea (T.S.K.); Dept of Radiology, Seoul National Univ Coll of Med and Institute of Radiation Med, Seoul National University Med Research Ctr, 28 Yongon-dong, Chongro-gu, Seoul 110-744, Korea (J.G.I., J.M.G., K.H.L., Y.J.L., S.H.K.); and Samsung Biomedical Research Institute, Samsung Med Ctr, Seoul, Korea (S.K.). Received Jun 20, 2001; revision requested Aug 13; revision received Sep 19; accepted Oct 16. Supported in part by grant HMP-98-G-1-014 of the Highly Advanced National Project, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Republic of Korea. Address correspondence to J.G.I. (e-mail: imjg@radcom.snu.ac.kr).



View larger version (141K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1a. Transverse (a) computed radiograph, (b) selenium-based digital radiograph, and (c) thin-section (1.0-mm collimation) CT scan of normal lung in a prone pig (thin-section CT grade 0) that were printed from PACS workstation monitor. Lungs are clear in all images.

 


View larger version (142K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1b. Transverse (a) computed radiograph, (b) selenium-based digital radiograph, and (c) thin-section (1.0-mm collimation) CT scan of normal lung in a prone pig (thin-section CT grade 0) that were printed from PACS workstation monitor. Lungs are clear in all images.

 


View larger version (181K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1c. Transverse (a) computed radiograph, (b) selenium-based digital radiograph, and (c) thin-section (1.0-mm collimation) CT scan of normal lung in a prone pig (thin-section CT grade 0) that were printed from PACS workstation monitor. Lungs are clear in all images.

 


View larger version (129K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2a. Transverse (a) computed radiograph, (b) selenium-based digital radiograph, and (c) thin-section CT scan in a prone pig with mild pulmonary edema (thin-section CT grade 2) that were printed from PACS workstation monitor. Note subtle patchy increased opacity (arrow) in both lungs in a and b. (c) Thin-section CT scan shows multifocal small areas of centrilobular ground-glass attenuation (arrows).

 


View larger version (128K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2b. Transverse (a) computed radiograph, (b) selenium-based digital radiograph, and (c) thin-section CT scan in a prone pig with mild pulmonary edema (thin-section CT grade 2) that were printed from PACS workstation monitor. Note subtle patchy increased opacity (arrow) in both lungs in a and b. (c) Thin-section CT scan shows multifocal small areas of centrilobular ground-glass attenuation (arrows).

 


View larger version (180K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2c. Transverse (a) computed radiograph, (b) selenium-based digital radiograph, and (c) thin-section CT scan in a prone pig with mild pulmonary edema (thin-section CT grade 2) that were printed from PACS workstation monitor. Note subtle patchy increased opacity (arrow) in both lungs in a and b. (c) Thin-section CT scan shows multifocal small areas of centrilobular ground-glass attenuation (arrows).

 


View larger version (151K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 3a. Transverse (a) computed radiograph, (b) selenium-based digital radiograph, and (c) thin-section CT scan in a prone pig with severe pulmonary edema (thin-section CT grade 4) that were printed from PACS workstation monitor. Note widespread haziness in both lungs in a and b. (c) Thin-section CT scan also shows widespread areas of ground-glass attenuation.

 


View larger version (152K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 3b. Transverse (a) computed radiograph, (b) selenium-based digital radiograph, and (c) thin-section CT scan in a prone pig with severe pulmonary edema (thin-section CT grade 4) that were printed from PACS workstation monitor. Note widespread haziness in both lungs in a and b. (c) Thin-section CT scan also shows widespread areas of ground-glass attenuation.

 


View larger version (179K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 3c. Transverse (a) computed radiograph, (b) selenium-based digital radiograph, and (c) thin-section CT scan in a prone pig with severe pulmonary edema (thin-section CT grade 4) that were printed from PACS workstation monitor. Note widespread haziness in both lungs in a and b. (c) Thin-section CT scan also shows widespread areas of ground-glass attenuation.

 


View larger version (58K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. True-positive rate of computed radiography (white bars) and selenium-based digital radiography (black bars) for the detection of pulmonary edema determined with thin-section CT (HRCT). 1 = grade 1, minimal edema (1%-10% in area of ground-glass attenuation determined with visual estimation); 2 = grade 2, mild edema (11%-40%); 3 = grade 3, moderate edema (41%-70%); 4 = grade 4, severe edema (>70%).

 


View larger version (37K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. False-negative rate of computed radiography (white bars) and selenium-based digital radiography (black bars) for the detection of pulmonary edema determined with thin-section CT (HRCT). Grades of pulmonary edema same as in Figure 4.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2002 by the Radiological Society of North America.