Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print April 19, 2002, 10.1148/radiol.2233011166
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow View responses
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kaiser, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by Roubidoux, M. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kaiser, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by Roubidoux, M. A.
(Radiology 2002;223:839-844.)
© RSNA, 2002

Palpable Breast Thickening: Role of Mammography and US in Cancer Detection1

Jacqueline S. Kaiser, MD, Mark A. Helvie, MD, R. Lisa Blacklaw, RT(R) (M) and Marilyn A. Roubidoux, MD

1 From the Department of Radiology, University of Michigan Health Systems, 1500 E Medical Center Dr, Taubman Center 2910N, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0326. Received July 9, 2001; revision requested August 3; revision received October 15; accepted December 10. Address correspondence to M.A.H.



View larger version (110K):

[in a new window]
 
(a) Craniocaudal and (b) mediolateral oblique mammographic views demonstrate questionable distortion on the mediolateral oblique view only (arrow in b). (c) Spot craniocaudal view shows the suspicious architectural distortion clearly (arrows). (d) Spot lateral view also confirms the suspicious architectural distortion (arrows). Invasive lobular cancer was found at biopsy.

 


View larger version (128K):

[in a new window]
 
(a) Craniocaudal and (b) mediolateral oblique mammographic views demonstrate questionable distortion on the mediolateral oblique view only (arrow in b). (c) Spot craniocaudal view shows the suspicious architectural distortion clearly (arrows). (d) Spot lateral view also confirms the suspicious architectural distortion (arrows). Invasive lobular cancer was found at biopsy.

 


View larger version (121K):

[in a new window]
 
(a) Craniocaudal and (b) mediolateral oblique mammographic views demonstrate questionable distortion on the mediolateral oblique view only (arrow in b). (c) Spot craniocaudal view shows the suspicious architectural distortion clearly (arrows). (d) Spot lateral view also confirms the suspicious architectural distortion (arrows). Invasive lobular cancer was found at biopsy.

 


View larger version (118K):

[in a new window]
 
(a) Craniocaudal and (b) mediolateral oblique mammographic views demonstrate questionable distortion on the mediolateral oblique view only (arrow in b). (c) Spot craniocaudal view shows the suspicious architectural distortion clearly (arrows). (d) Spot lateral view also confirms the suspicious architectural distortion (arrows). Invasive lobular cancer was found at biopsy.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2002 by the Radiological Society of North America.