Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print March 21, 2002, 10.1148/radiol.2232011257

(Radiology 2002;223:489.)

A more recent version of this article appeared on May 1, 2002
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Markey, M. K.
Right arrow Articles by Floyd, C. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Markey, M. K.
Right arrow Articles by Floyd, C. E., Jr

Differences between Computer-aided Diagnosis of Breast Masses and That of Calcifications1

Mia K. Markey, BS, Joseph Y. Lo, PhD and Carey E. Floyd, Jr, PhD

1 From the Departments of Biomedical Engineering and Radiology, Digital Imaging Research Division, Duke University Medical Center, DUMC 3302, Durham, NC 27710. Received July 23, 2001; revision requested September 4; revision received October 12; accepted December 10. Supported in part by U.S. Public Health Service grants R29-CA75547, R21-CA092573, and R21-CA81309 awarded by the National Cancer Institute; Whitaker Foundation grants RG-97-0322 and SO-97-0035; U.S. Army Medical Research and Materiel Command grant DAMD17-99-1-9174 awarded by the U.S. Army; and Susan G. Komen Breast Cancer Foundation grants 9803 and BCTR2000730A. Address correspondence to M.K.M. (e-mail: markey@duke.edu).



View larger version (29K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. ROC curves for the mammographers’ assessment of the likelihood of malignancy in the cases from Duke University Medical Center. The mammographers’ assessment was more accurate for masses than for calcifications. FPF = false-positive fraction, TPF = true-positive fraction.

 


View larger version (30K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. ROC curves for the BP-ANN in the cases from Duke University Medical Center. BP-ANN was more accurate for masses than for calcifications. FPF = false-positive fraction, TPF = true-positive fraction.

 


View larger version (30K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. ROC curves for the LDA in the cases from Duke University Medical Center. LDA was more accurate for masses than for calcifications. FPF = false-positive fraction, TPF = true-positive fraction.

 


View larger version (30K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. ROC curves for the BP-ANN in the cases from the University of Pennsylvania Medical Center. BP-ANN was more accurate for masses than for calcifications. FPF = false-positive fraction, TPF = true-positive fraction.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2002 by the Radiological Society of North America.