Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print May 30, 2002, 10.1148/radiol.2241011202
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rush, W. J.
Right arrow Articles by Poe, S. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rush, W. J.
Right arrow Articles by Poe, S. A.

"Missing" Sternal Ossification Center: Potential Mimicker of Disease in Young Children1

William J. Rush, BS, Lane F. Donnelly, MD, Alan S. Brody, MD, Christopher G. Anton, MD and Stacy A. Poe, MS

1 From the Departments of Radiology (W.J.R., L.F.D., A.S.B., C.G.A.) and Pediatrics (L.F.D., A.S.B., C.G.A., S.A.P.), Children’s Hospital Medical Center, 3333 Burnet Ave, Cincinnati, OH 45229-3039. Received July 16, 2001; revision requested September 10; revision received November 15; accepted January 8, 2002. Address correspondence to L.F.D. (e-mail: Lane.donnelly@chmcc.org).



View larger version (76K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1a. Radiographs obtained because of cough in a 2-year-old boy show missing sternal ossification center. (a) Lateral radiograph shows markedly decreased ossification of sternal segment 2 (arrows). The absence of ossification and the absence of soft-tissue prominence in the region were interpreted as suggestive of a destructive process. Numbers denote sternal segments. The region of sternal segment 5 (arrowhead) is also nonossified. Findings of a radiographic skeletal survey were otherwise normal. 1, 3, and 4 = sternal segments 1, 3, and 4. (b) Sagittal fast spin-echo magnetic resonance (MR) image (repetitition time msec/echo time msec, 3,000/15) with intermediate weighting shows no abnormality in the region of sternal segment 2 (arrows). (c) Sagittal fast spin-echo MR image (3,000/80) with T2 weighting shows high signal intensity in ossified sternal segments 1, 3, and 4. Sternal segments 2 (arrows) and 5 (arrowheads) demonstrate low signal intensity, which is consistent with asynchronous ossification.

 


View larger version (89K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1b. Radiographs obtained because of cough in a 2-year-old boy show missing sternal ossification center. (a) Lateral radiograph shows markedly decreased ossification of sternal segment 2 (arrows). The absence of ossification and the absence of soft-tissue prominence in the region were interpreted as suggestive of a destructive process. Numbers denote sternal segments. The region of sternal segment 5 (arrowhead) is also nonossified. Findings of a radiographic skeletal survey were otherwise normal. 1, 3, and 4 = sternal segments 1, 3, and 4. (b) Sagittal fast spin-echo magnetic resonance (MR) image (repetitition time msec/echo time msec, 3,000/15) with intermediate weighting shows no abnormality in the region of sternal segment 2 (arrows). (c) Sagittal fast spin-echo MR image (3,000/80) with T2 weighting shows high signal intensity in ossified sternal segments 1, 3, and 4. Sternal segments 2 (arrows) and 5 (arrowheads) demonstrate low signal intensity, which is consistent with asynchronous ossification.

 


View larger version (97K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1c. Radiographs obtained because of cough in a 2-year-old boy show missing sternal ossification center. (a) Lateral radiograph shows markedly decreased ossification of sternal segment 2 (arrows). The absence of ossification and the absence of soft-tissue prominence in the region were interpreted as suggestive of a destructive process. Numbers denote sternal segments. The region of sternal segment 5 (arrowhead) is also nonossified. Findings of a radiographic skeletal survey were otherwise normal. 1, 3, and 4 = sternal segments 1, 3, and 4. (b) Sagittal fast spin-echo magnetic resonance (MR) image (repetitition time msec/echo time msec, 3,000/15) with intermediate weighting shows no abnormality in the region of sternal segment 2 (arrows). (c) Sagittal fast spin-echo MR image (3,000/80) with T2 weighting shows high signal intensity in ossified sternal segments 1, 3, and 4. Sternal segments 2 (arrows) and 5 (arrowheads) demonstrate low signal intensity, which is consistent with asynchronous ossification.

 


View larger version (79K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Lateral radiograph obtained in a 1-year-old boy shows nonossification of sternal segment 2 (2). Sternal segments 1, 3, 4, and 5 (1, 3, 4, and 5) are ossified.

 


View larger version (59K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Lateral radiograph obtained in a 10-month-old girl shows lack of ossification of sternal segment 5. Sternal segments 1-4 (1-4) are ossified.

 


View larger version (74K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Lateral radiograph shows lack of ossification of sternal segments 2, 4, and 5 (arrows) in a 1-year-old girl. Sternal segments 1 (1) and 3 (3) are ossified.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2002 by the Radiological Society of North America.