Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print May 30, 2002, 10.1148/radiol.2241001445
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tsubamoto, M.
Right arrow Articles by Kuroda, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tsubamoto, M.
Right arrow Articles by Kuroda, C.

Detection of Lung Cancer on Chest Radiographs: Analysis on the Basis of Size and Extent of Ground-Glass Opacity at Thin-Section CT1

Mitsuko Tsubamoto, MD, Keiko Kuriyama, MD, Shoji Kido, MD, Jun Arisawa, MD, Nobuaki Kohno, MD, Takeshi Johkoh, MD, Noriyuki Tomiyama, MD, Osamu Honda, MD and Chikazumi Kuroda, MD

1 From the Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Osaka Medical Center for Cancer and Cardiovascular Diseases, Japan (M.T., K.K., J.A., C.K.); Department of Computer Science and Systems Engineering, Yamaguchi University, Japan (S.K.); Department of Radiology, Osaka Chuo Hospital, Japan (N.K.); and Department of Radiology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan (M.T., T.J., N.T., O.H.). Received August 25, 2000; revision requested October 14; final revision received September 20, 2001; accepted December 11. Address correspondence to M.T. (e-mail: tubamoto@radiol.med.osaka-u.ac.jp).



View larger version (126K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1a. (a) Posteroanterior chest radiograph of a tumor in group 1. In this case, the tumor (arrows) was visible on the chest radiograph because although it had low opacity it was large enough to be seen. (b) Transverse thin-section CT image of the same tumor. The tumor was BAC. The size of the tumor (arrow) was 20 mm, and the extent of GGO was 90%.

 


View larger version (127K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1b. (a) Posteroanterior chest radiograph of a tumor in group 1. In this case, the tumor (arrows) was visible on the chest radiograph because although it had low opacity it was large enough to be seen. (b) Transverse thin-section CT image of the same tumor. The tumor was BAC. The size of the tumor (arrow) was 20 mm, and the extent of GGO was 90%.

 


View larger version (133K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2a. (a) Posteroanterior chest radiograph of a tumor in group 2. In this case, the tumor (arrows) was visible on the chest radiograph because it was opaque and large. (b) Transverse thin-section CT image of the same tumor. The tumor (arrow) was BAC. The size of the tumor was 18 mm, and the extent of GGO was 12%.

 


View larger version (127K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2b. (a) Posteroanterior chest radiograph of a tumor in group 2. In this case, the tumor (arrows) was visible on the chest radiograph because it was opaque and large. (b) Transverse thin-section CT image of the same tumor. The tumor (arrow) was BAC. The size of the tumor was 18 mm, and the extent of GGO was 12%.

 


View larger version (118K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 3a. (a) Posteroanterior chest radiograph of a tumor in group 3. The tumor was difficult to detect on the radiograph because the lesion was small and faint. The arrow indicates the location where the lesion is thought to lie. (b) Transverse thin-section CT image of the same tumor. The tumor (arrow) was BAC. The size of the tumor was 12 mm, and the extent of GGO was 95%.

 


View larger version (125K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 3b. (a) Posteroanterior chest radiograph of a tumor in group 3. The tumor was difficult to detect on the radiograph because the lesion was small and faint. The arrow indicates the location where the lesion is thought to lie. (b) Transverse thin-section CT image of the same tumor. The tumor (arrow) was BAC. The size of the tumor was 12 mm, and the extent of GGO was 95%.

 


View larger version (125K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 4a. (a) Posteroanterior chest radiograph of a tumor in group 4. In this case, the tumor (arrows) was visible on the chest radiograph because it was small but opaque. (b) Transverse thin-section CT image of the same tumor. The tumor (arrow) was BAC. The size of the tumor was 8 mm, and the extent of GGO was 50%.

 


View larger version (128K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 4b. (a) Posteroanterior chest radiograph of a tumor in group 4. In this case, the tumor (arrows) was visible on the chest radiograph because it was small but opaque. (b) Transverse thin-section CT image of the same tumor. The tumor (arrow) was BAC. The size of the tumor was 8 mm, and the extent of GGO was 50%.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2002 by the Radiological Society of North America.