Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print June 28, 2002, 10.1148/radiol.2242011353

(Radiology 2002;224:513.)

A more recent version of this article appeared on August 1, 2002
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Scott, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Scott, J. A.

Pulmonary Perfusion Patterns and Pulmonary Arterial Pressure1

James A. Scott, MD

1 From the Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit St, Boston, MA 02114. Received August 9, 2001; revision requested September 7; revision received October 22; accepted December 11. Address correspondence to the author.



View larger version (22K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Example of fractal dimension calculation in (top row) a patient with pulmonary hypertension (predicted pressure, 75 mm Hg; measured PA systolic [sys] pressure, 80 mm Hg) and (bottom row) a normotensive patient (predicted pressure, 16 mm Hg; actual PA systolic pressure, 18 mm Hg). In the top and bottom rows, the left image is the original posterior perfusion image of the right lung, the middle image shows the lung contour after subtracting 20% of the lowest count pixels, and the right image shows the lung contour after subtracting 33% of the lowest count pixels. Fractal dimension (FD) is shown beneath each subtracted image. The fractal dimension is higher in the patient with pulmonary hypertension and increases as more low-count density pixels are subtracted from the original image.

 


View larger version (23K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Graph shows correlation of each input parameter with the measured PA systolic pressure. These individual correlation coefficients, ranging from 0.070 to 0.432, are small compared with the correlation coefficient of the ANN prediction (0.846). LP = left lung posterior view, RP = right lung posterior view, RA = right lung anterior view, LA = left lung anterior view; 33%, 25%, 20%, and 17% refer to the percentages of low-count density pixels that were subtracted from the original image. R-Mean and L-Mean are the mean pixel densities in the posterior view of the right and left lungs, respectively. R-SD and L-SD are the standard deviations of pixel density in the posterior view of the right and left lungs, respectively.

 


View larger version (28K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Scatterplot of ANN-predicted PA systolic pressures versus those measured at angiography in patients with and in those without pulmonary embolism (r = 0.846, P < .001).

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2002 by the Radiological Society of North America.