Published online before print July 19, 2002, 10.1148/radiol.2243011390
(Radiology 2002;224:639.)
A more recent version of this article appeared on September 1, 2002
The Importance of Strategy for the Evolving Field of Radiology1
Stephen Chan, MD, MBA, MPH
1 From the Department of Radiology, Columbia University, 177 Fort Washington Ave, Milstein Hospital Bldg, 3rd Fl, New York, NY 10032. Received August 15, 2001; revision requested October 11; revision received December 11; accepted January 7, 2002. Address correspondence to the author (e-mail: sc56@columbia.edu).

View larger version (71K):
[in a new window]
|
Figure 1. Basic framework for strategy development. SWOT = strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats.
|
|

View larger version (73K):
[in a new window]
|
Figure 2. Possible SWOT analysis of radiology from the perspective of national radiologic societies. NIH = National Institutes of Health.
|
|

View larger version (59K):
[in a new window]
|
Figure 3. Five forces analysis. Many experts add regulators as a "sixth force" to be considered in this framework. This is because governmental regulation may serve as a constraint on the range of strategic options to be considered and may have a tangible effect on the outcome associated with a chosen organizational strategy. ASP = application service providers, HCFA = Health Care Financing Administration, PACS = picture archiving and communication system.
|
|

View larger version (41K):
[in a new window]
|
Figure 4. Analytic tools used for different levels of residual uncertainty.
|
|
Copyright © 2002 by the Radiological Society of North America.