Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print November 21, 2002, 10.1148/radiol.2261020141

(Radiology 2003;226:188.)

A more recent version of this article appeared on January 1, 2003
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Oguz, K. K.
Right arrow Articles by Yousem, D. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Oguz, K. K.
Right arrow Articles by Yousem, D. M.

Correlation of Functional MR Imaging Activation Data with Simple Reaction Times1

Kader Karli Oguz, MD, Nina Mikelashvili Browner, MD, Vince D. Calhoun, PhD, Colin Wu, PhD, Michael A. Kraut, MD and David M. Yousem, MD

1 From the Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Divisions of Neuroradiology (K.K.O., N.M.B., M.A.K., D.M.Y.) and Psychiatric Neuro-Imaging (V.D.C.), Johns Hopkins Hospital, 600 N Wolfe St, Phipps B-112, Baltimore, MD 21287; and Office of Biostatistics Research, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (C.W.). Received February 22, 2002; revision requested May 15; revision received June 24; accepted July 31. Supported by RPN 99-01-21-03. K.K.O. supported in part by TUBITAK (Scientific and Technical Research Council of Turkey). Address correspondence to D.M.Y. (e-mail: yousem@rad.jhu.edu).



View larger version (173K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Transverse activation map in a subject with fast RTs shows activation in the visual (arrowheads; activation in the left cortex greater than that in the right) and sensorimotor cortices (images presented in radiologic convention, where right side of image is left side of brain). The left sensorimotor cortex activation (straight arrows) is greater than that of the right (curved arrow). No supplemental motor cortex activation is seen.

 


View larger version (145K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Transverse activation map in a subject with slow RTs. Less activation is seen in the visual and motor cortices than that in the subject with fast RTs in Figure 1.

 


View larger version (169K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 3a. Transverse activation group maps of subjects with (a) fast and (b) slow RTs. Subjects with fast RTs show more activation in the visual (arrowheads) and sensorimotor (arrows) cortices than do subjects with slow RTs. Even the intensity of the activation is greater in the subjects with fast RTs (red and orange areas show greater statistical correlation than do yellow and green areas).

 


View larger version (174K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 3b. Transverse activation group maps of subjects with (a) fast and (b) slow RTs. Subjects with fast RTs show more activation in the visual (arrowheads) and sensorimotor (arrows) cortices than do subjects with slow RTs. Even the intensity of the activation is greater in the subjects with fast RTs (red and orange areas show greater statistical correlation than do yellow and green areas).

 


View larger version (175K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Transverse subtraction map of activation in the fast RT group versus that in the slow RT group shows the difference in activation volumes in the left visual and sensorimotor cortices. Interestingly, the difference in right sensorimotor cortex activation between the two groups becomes more striking. It is well known that unilateral motor cortex activation often involves both sensorimotor cortices; therefore, the right-sided differences may be discovered by comparing the group maps in Figures 3 and 4.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2002 by the Radiological Society of North America.