Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print May 1, 2003, 10.1148/radiol.2273020046

(Radiology 2003;227:862.)

A more recent version of this article appeared on June 1, 2003
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bassett, L. W.
Right arrow Articles by Jackson, V. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bassett, L. W.
Right arrow Articles by Jackson, V. P.

Survey of Radiology Residents: Breast Imaging Training and Attitudes1

Lawrence W. Bassett, MD, Barbara S. Monsees, MD, Robert A. Smith, PhD, Lily Wang, MD, Parizad Hooshi, MD, Dione M. Farria, MD, James W. Sayre, PhD, Stephen A. Feig, MD and Valerie P. Jackson, MD

1 From the Iris Cantor Center for Breast Imaging, Department of Radiology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA and UCLA-Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, 200 UCLA Medical Plaza, Rm 165-49, Los Angeles, CA 90095-6952 (L.W.B., L.W., P.H., J.W.S.); Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine and Siteman Cancer Center, St Louis, Mo (B.S.M., D.M.F.); Cancer Control Department, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Ga (R.A.S.); Department of Radiology, Mount Sinai School of Medicine of New York University and Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY (S.A.F.); and Department of Radiology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis (V.P.J.). From the 2001 RSNA scientific assembly. Received February 5, 2002; revision requested April 2; final revision received October 2; accepted October 14. Address correspondence to L.W.B.



View larger version (17K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Graph shows reasons selected by 132 residents who would not consider a fellowship in breast imaging if offered. Residents could select as many reasons as they thought applied to them. The y axis indicates the number of times the reason was selected by residents who would not consider a fellowship in breast imaging.

 


View larger version (19K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Graph shows reasons selected by 133 residents who would not like to spend a substantial portion of time (>=25%) for interpretation of mammograms in their future practices. Residents could select as many reasons as they thought applied to them. The y axis indicates the number of times a reason was selected by residents who would not like to spend a substantial portion of time (>=25%) for interpretation of mammograms.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2003 by the Radiological Society of North America.