Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print June 11, 2003, 10.1148/radiol.2282020915
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McMahon, P. M.
Right arrow Articles by Gazelle, G. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by McMahon, P. M.
Right arrow Articles by Gazelle, G. S.

Cost-Effectiveness of PET in the Diagnosis of Alzheimer Disease1

Pamela M. McMahon, BS, Sally S. Araki, SM, Eileen A. Sandberg, SM, Peter J. Neumann, ScD and G. Scott Gazelle, MD, MPH, PhD

1 From the Institute for Technology Assessment, Massachusetts General Hospital, Zero Emerson Place, Suite 2H, Boston, MA 02114 (P.M.M., G.S.G.); Doctoral Program in Health Policy, Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass (P.M.M., S.S.A., E.A.S.); Program on the Economic Evaluation of Medical Technology, Harvard Center for Risk Analysis, Cambridge, Mass (S.S.A., E.A.S., P.J.N.); and Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Mass (P.J.N., G.S.G.). P.M.M. supported in part by the National Cancer Institute grant 1 R25 CA92203-01A1 and the National Library of Medicine grant 5 T-15 LM07092. P.M.M. and G.S.G. supported in part by the U.S. Department of the Army under DAMD grant 17-99-2-9001. Received July 24, 2002; revision requested September 18; revision received September 25; accepted October 25. Address correspondence to G.S.G. (e-mail: scott@mgh-ita.org).



View larger version (22K):

[in a new window]
 
With our base-case assumptions, the addition of either PET or computed SPECT (cSPECT) to the standard clinical examination results in a strategy that costs more but yields fewer gains in QALYs. Dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast-enhanced (ie, functional) MR imaging (DSC-MRI), as compared with the standard examination, yields gains in effectiveness at an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $598,800 per QALY. When no side effects in the patients with non-AD-related dementia who are treated with donepezil hydrochloride are included in the model, the strategy of treating all patients with dementia dominates all the imaging strategies, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $141,200 per QALY.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2003 by the Radiological Society of North America.