Published online before print June 11, 2003, 10.1148/radiol.2282020915
Cost-Effectiveness of PET in the Diagnosis of Alzheimer Disease1
Pamela M. McMahon, BS,
Sally S. Araki, SM,
Eileen A. Sandberg, SM,
Peter J. Neumann, ScD and
G. Scott Gazelle, MD, MPH, PhD
1 From the Institute for Technology Assessment, Massachusetts General Hospital, Zero Emerson Place, Suite 2H, Boston, MA 02114 (P.M.M., G.S.G.); Doctoral Program in Health Policy, Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass (P.M.M., S.S.A., E.A.S.); Program on the Economic Evaluation of Medical Technology, Harvard Center for Risk Analysis, Cambridge, Mass (S.S.A., E.A.S., P.J.N.); and Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Mass (P.J.N., G.S.G.). P.M.M. supported in part by the National Cancer Institute grant 1 R25 CA92203-01A1 and the National Library of Medicine grant 5 T-15 LM07092. P.M.M. and G.S.G. supported in part by the U.S. Department of the Army under DAMD grant 17-99-2-9001. Received July 24, 2002; revision requested September 18; revision received September 25; accepted October 25. Address correspondence to G.S.G. (e-mail: scott@mgh-ita.org).

View larger version (22K):
[in a new window]
|
With our base-case assumptions, the addition of either PET or computed SPECT (cSPECT) to the standard clinical examination results in a strategy that costs more but yields fewer gains in QALYs. Dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast-enhanced (ie, functional) MR imaging (DSC-MRI), as compared with the standard examination, yields gains in effectiveness at an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $598,800 per QALY. When no side effects in the patients with non-AD-related dementia who are treated with donepezil hydrochloride are included in the model, the strategy of treating all patients with dementia dominates all the imaging strategies, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $141,200 per QALY.
|
|
Copyright © 2003 by the Radiological Society of North America.